Library filtering suit dismissed
A California superior court judge throws out a lawsuit calling for mandatory filters on library computers used to surf the Internet.
But the attorney who filed the suit said that the case will not end here.
A Livermore woman, identified only as Kathleen R., filed a lawsuit in May calling for the court to force the Livermore library system to install filtering software on library computers that have Internet access--or otherwise limit children's unfettered access to the Net.
That provision has been affirmed in several courts, including the Supreme Court, which declined to hear an appeal of a case in which a man tried to hold online service provider America Online legally accountable for defamatory messages that other members posted on its system.
But Mike Millen, who filed the suit on behalf of Kathleen R and the Pacific Justice Institute, a Sacramento-based nonprofit legal defense organization specializing in religious freedom and parents' rights, said that today's ruling "is just one small step in a very long journey."
So far, courts have ruled against the latter.
"Parents don't understand how dangerous the library has become for children," Millen said.
Along with library fights and lawsuits, the war also is being waged on other--perhaps more powerful--fronts as well. President Clinton just signed into law an annual spending bill that includes several provisions that hold Internet service providers accountable for information that children obtain over the Internet. Civil liberties groups tomorrow plan to file suit against one such provision, dubbed the CDA II: the Child Online Protection Act.