If the European Parliament does decide to kill the directive, there will be no new proposal from the Commission, Charlie McCreevy, commissioner for the Internal Market, told a parliament plenary session on Tuesday evening.
"You can, of course, reject or substantially amend the proposal," he said. "If the Parliament decides to reject it, then the Commission will respect your wishes. I will not propose a new directive." The European Parliament considers legislation proposed by the Commission.
McCreevy's statement has been seen as a veiled threat by some observers. The Parliament has been pushing the Commission to submit a new proposal on software patenting, but McCreevy's comments make it clear that the EU will either get a directive based on the current text, or nothing at all.
"It will indeed be difficult to get this rejected, because many will believe that there should be some directive at the end of the process," said Florian Mueller, head of the NoSoftwarePatents.com campaign.
Critics, including directive would open the doors to U.S.-style software patents in Europe. Software patents would be with but would make it difficult for and smaller companies to compete, industry observers say., say the
The directive is supported by multinational IT companies such as IBM and Microsoft, which say it provides companies with valuable patent protection.
The Council of the European Union, also known as the Council of Ministers,on the "patentability of computer-implemented inventions" on Monday morning, despite asking for the legislative process to be restarted.
The national governments of several countries, including Spain, the Netherlands,and , have formally expressed their criticism of the current version of the directive, which dates from May 2004, and supported a restart.
Adoption of the draft as the Council of the European Union's Common Position (click here for PDF) means the directive will return to the Parliament for a second reading, with a limit of three months to decide on changes or a rejection. Changes are difficult to ratify in a second reading, requiring the support of more than half the Parliament's members, regardless of attendance.
Austrian MEP Eva Lichtenberger said the process was on the verge of turning into a "power struggle" between Council, Commission and Parliament, rather than a consideration of the issues. "The text of 18 May no longer has a majority in its present form. The objections of the states have remained unconsidered until now," she said in the plenary meeting.
McCreevy acknowledged there was nowto the current version of the directive. "I know a new wind is blowing on this. This is reflective of the position expressed in the Council and the Parliament, and the Commission will take account of this and respect this," he said.
Audio recordings of the plenary session were made available by several Web sites. Links to the recordings can be found on the site of the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure.