Gates' big send-off

@import url('http://www.cnet.com/css/ssa/news/special.css'); #h1 {background:url('http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/ne/p/2008/gates3_980x182.jpg') left top;width:980px;height:169px;margin-top:-20px;} #Sidebar h3 {background-color:#000;margin:0;padding:5px 10px;color:#FFF;font-size:1.3em;text-transform:none;} .upcoming {color:#999;} #Content {margin-top:-40px;padding: 0 0 0 0;} .dr{display:none;} #Content h4 { font-size: 1.5em! important; margin: 0px 0; color: #ff3737; } #Content h5 { font-size: 1.2em! important; margin: 0; padding-top:10px; } .anchors { padding: 5px 30px 20px 0px; font-family: verdana, geneva, helvetica; font-size: 80%; } .anchors_link { color: #ff3737; text-decoration: none;} .credits { font: .9em verdana, arial; margin: 0 0 6px 6px; color: #666666; } .v1 {font-family: verdana, geneva, helvetica; font-size: 80%;} .sct_media_img {display: inline; float: left; width: 88px; margin: 10px 12px 12px 20px;} .sct_media_pad {padding-top: 5px;} .grey {color:#666;} #staffbox {margin-top: 0; background-color: #89865C; font: .9em verdana; color: #FFF; padding: 4px;} #eye {padding:4px 0 0px 20px;float:left;} #eye b {text-transform:uppercase;color:#ffffff;font-size:.8em;} #eye h1 {margin:0;display:inline;color:#333;font-size:.8em;font-weight:normal;} #rt_eye {width:350px;height:5px;display:inline;float:right;text-align:right;font-weight:bold;font-size:.8em;padding-top:2px;margin-right:10px;} #rt_eye a {color:#ffffff;} #rt_eye a:hover {color:#ffffff;} #datetop {color:#333;font-size:.8em;display:block;padding:5px 0;} #taxMap { width: 315px; border: 1px solid #CCC; background: #FFF url(http://news.com.com/i/ne/sr06/taxtunes/taxMapBack.gif) repeat-x; font: 90% verdana, geneva; float:left; margin: 0 10px 0 0; } #taxMap h4 { padding: 5px; color: #FFF; background: #323200; font-size: 120%; margin: 0 0 5px; } #taxMap p { margin: 0 5px 10px; } #usMap { display: block; width: 315px; } #allStates { position: relative; height: 100px; } #allStates .stateInfo { display: none; position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; padding: 5px; width: 305px; height: 90px; overflow: auto; } #allStates #mapInfo { display: block; } #allStates h5 { padding: 3px; margin: 0 0 5px; font-size: 100%; } #allStates .yes h5 { border-left: 10px solid #993; } #allStates .no h5 { border-left: 10px solid #D84012; } #allStates .poss h5 { border-left: 10px solid #FEDE58; } #allStates p { margin: 0 0 3px; } #allStates p.attribute { font-size: 95%; font-weight: bold; color: #777; } #Sidebar { background-color: #FFF; border-top: 1px solid #52522C; border-left: 1px solid #52522C; border-bottom: 1px solid #52522C; margin-right: 0px; float: right; width: 324px; padding-right: 0; } .rightside_header { background-color: #003366; width: 314px; height: 25px; color: #FFF; font-weight:bold; padding: 5px 0 0 10px; } .rightinside p { font: .85em verdana, arial; margin: 0 0 2px 6px; } .rightinside { position: relative; padding: 5px 5px; } div.media h2{border-bottom:none;} .media img { float: left; margin: 0 10px 10px 0; border: 1px solid #000; } #Sidebar a {color:#0033cc !important;} div#Sidebar img{float:left;} var lastState = "mapInfo"; function showStateInfo(state) { state = "info"+state; document.getElementById(lastState).style.display="none"; document.getElementById(state).style.display="block"; lastState = state; } News.com special coverage: Gates' big send-off TalkBack E-mail del.icio.us Digg this Co-founder shares surprises, letdowns, morsels from early Microsoft days By Ina Fried Staff Writer, CNET News.com June 24, 2008 4:00 AM PST TalkBack E-mail del.icio.us Digg this REDMOND, Wash.--If you ask Bill Gates what life will be like when he stops working full time at Microsoft, he'll have to get back to you. That's because, a week away from the transition, he still hasn't slowed down his pace. If anything, things have picked up as he tries to have one last meeting with all the leaders and projects that are important to him. Gates, who dropped out of school more than 30 years ago to run Microsoft, steps down from full-time work on Friday. He'll remain chairman and a part-time Microsoft employee. Credit: Ina Fried Bill Gates poses for a shot in his office, which includes a three-monitor display set-up as well as a Surface tabletop computer. The Microsoft co-founder did take some time out of his schedule recently to sit down with CNET News.com's Ina Fried and offer some reflections on the early days of the PC market as well as thoughts on where Microsoft is now and what technologies he will need in his new role, working full time for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. In the interview, Gates shared some little-known stories from the company's early days, including the fact that Microsoft seriously entertained combining with Lotus, but talks ended when that company's chief executive pulled out. Gates also noted that Microsoft was invited and then uninvited to the launch event for the first IBM PC. "We'd been invited, and then they decided not to invite us," Gates said. "Well, we had been working night and day. I had told people, yeah, we had this invitation that said, yeah, we're going to go, there's going to be a big deal. And then they decided, nah, we don't want you to come to the thing. That was a little bit of a downer." Q: As you've been thinking about the transition, what are the kinds of things that have been on your mind the most? Gates: Well, for 33 years I've worked at Microsoft and come in every day, and thought about what are the new things we need to do, and what's my personal role in that, a lot of e-mail, lot of meetings, lot of product reviews. So, in a sense it's hard for me to project what it's going to be like for me or Microsoft when I'm not here. As long as I'm here, I'm still sending a lot of e-mail and in a lot of meetings, and so the real change in terms of people having an opportunity to step up and do things, to some degree it's after July 1 when my involvement is only a very specific involvement on particular projects as opposed to the overall strategy thing. Everybody likes to pick the current competitive battles that we're in, and kind of think, OK, those are the big things. For me, I'd pick like tablet or interactive TV that are, according to me--but I've been over-optimistic before--on the verge of big, big impact. So, I've been sending a lot of mail to the tablet and interactive TV team, sort of sending the mail I would have sent three months from now, now, just giving them encouragement. Because, you know, all the big successes, whether it's Office integration or Windows, it takes a long time for those things to get established. We thought it would be a good idea for me to go to the Windows 7 group and go see the work, and I was thrilled. Steven Sinofsky took me around, showed me what they're doing. So, you're going to product group by product group? Gates: Well, in terms of big meetings, that's pretty much done. Like the Windows group had a meeting, and the Surface group had a meeting, but this is more just sitting down with the top executives, so Stephen Elop, Craig Mundie, Kevin Turner. The timing is actually pretty good. We just did our business reviews. We do the business planning, which is for the next fiscal year, which starts July 1. So, we have the plans in place, and I sat through that last set of reviews, but it's a perfect example of something that as just a board member working on projects I won't sit in those business plan reviews in the future. I mean, Steve (Ballmer) may ask me to sit in on one that touches directly on something I'm doing, but the default is that I'm not there at all. I hear search is one you're still pretty enthused about. Gates: Yeah, that doesn't mean I'd necessarily go to their business plan review, but I've developed a relationship with them where brainstorming and thinking about what things we'd pick and how we do it. You know, it's another good example of something that breakthrough work is not--doesn't happen in a day; it happens in many years. Now, many of those years fortunately are the years we've already put into it, but to really help that keep on track, and just to give them the positive feedback as they're going through it, that group, that's actually the only one that's truly concrete at this point where literally we've scheduled out a bit this summer and even some into the fall when and how I'm going to look at various aspects of their work. We weren't that well-known publicly until sometime in the 1980s, and one of my favorite articles was where they wrote that there were four software companies, and none of them was that much different than the others. But we knew at that time that the other three just weren't long term, hiring the right people, thinking globally. Can you think of a time when the company really sort of behind the scenes was coming from behind? I mean, we've all heard sort of the early days of developing the first version of DOS, but are there other times where it was kind of a mad scramble? Gates: Well, we weren't that well-known publicly until sometime in the 1980s, and one of my favorite articles was where they wrote that there were four software companies, and none of them was that much different than the others. But we knew at that time that the other three just weren't long term, hiring the right people, thinking globally. It was ourselves, Ashton Tate, WordPerfect, and, I guess, Lotus. There were many software companies that were bigger than us. VisiCorp was bigger than us at a point in time. MicroPro (publisher of WordStar) was bigger than us at a point in time. And then each of those three--WordPerfect, Lotus, and Ashton Tate--were bigger than us at a time. But the way we were going about it and just thinking about software and how was the chip going to change and how did the pieces come together, and how did you do business in Europe and stuff, we were just different, we were just a long-term company. So, it was funny to me that the article was written right as if somebody had really looked carefully, they would see that we were quite different than those others. And then it was only about four years later that there was a spoof article in InfoWorld where they said Microsoft announced today that Ashton Tate never existed, which is kind of an over-the-top thing. But that was a period where we came to the fore. There's a lot of interesting twists and turns. There was actually a point where we talked with Lotus about getting together with them, but it wasn't a good cultural fit there. It was actually (Lotus CEO Jim) Manzi who--I mean, it wouldn't necessarily have happened--but it was Manzi who ended the discussions. There was one day that was rather funny. IBM didn't invite us to the introduction of the PC. We'd been invited, and then they decided not to invite us. Well, we had been working night and day. I had told people, yeah, we had this invitation that said, yeah, we're going to go, there's going to be a big deal, and then they decided, nah, we don't want you to come to the thing. That was a little bit of a downer. Now, who cares, but... Looking back at those early days, if you could give that 21-year-old you just starting Microsoft some advice, what would you--is there something that you know now that you didn't then that would have been useful? Gates: Not really. I mean, you can say, hey, you're going to be successful, so don't work so hard or something like that, but then it might completely erase the whole thing. Or learn that you're going to need a mix of skills, not just engineering skills. But at first the fact that we were just over-the-top engineering-centric wasn't so stupid. Today, as you get a large company, having a push that says, hey, we've got to stay somewhat engineering-centric, even as you have all these different skill sets, you know, I could have told myself that guys' IQ, it's not as fungible to learn other things. If they show IQ in domain A, you know, I always thought, well, then just use them in domain B. And that worked a bit. You even see another company in the industry doing this bit where you'll hire somebody who's a good scientist, and you say they can be a programmer, and you only--you interview them on sort of their--the depth of knowledge about the field they've spent in, and assume they can come to the other field. Some of that is true. But when you go into, say, management-type things or dealing with people-type things, then the number of people whose IQ is fungible is surprisingly low. The thing that I would drool over is to walk over to Microsoft Research and see that here are people spending full time on vision, full time on speech, full time on machine learning, full time on software proof, where at early Microsoft we couldn't give back to the intellectual base. I mean, that's the greatest surprise to me of all in my whole business career is that you find people who are so good at one thing, and where the principles and models and approaches in that and in the other area are actually very similar, very similar, and yet they're very poor at the one and just beyond brilliant at the other. What do you think--if that same 21-year-old you could see where things have gotten, what do you think would be most surprising? Because it sounds like you had the ambition all along. Gates: Well, yeah, we certainly said a computer on every desk and in every home. I had calculated out that we'd only need a thousand developers to write all the software that we were going to do all the horizontal software. So, definitely if you took me to this place, I'm sure as a 21-year-old, I'd say, what do all these people do, and how can you afford (all of this)--look at these offices, look at this wasted space. Shuttles? Come on! Somebody is paying for all these shrubberies and things? You guys are crazy. You have too many people, and just the cost structure would blow my mind, because I was thinking, OK, should we let people have two chairs in their office or just one chair, kind of thing. I'd come into this office and meet myself and I'd say, well, are you still reading all the code? I mean, these guys could ship some really crummy code; I hope you're still reading it. And I'd be like, are you kidding? It's been a decade since I took anybody's listing home and read it. It would be like, well, then how do you keep it good? The thing that I would drool over is to walk over to Microsoft Research and see that here are people spending full time on vision, full time on speech, full time on machine learning, full time on software proof, where at early Microsoft we couldn't give back to the intellectual base. We drew on the base that the universities and Xerox had done, and we used it in a fantastic way, as did Apple and the whole personal computer industry. Now we are very significant. In fact, if you leave universities out of it, we are probably the most significant computer science research thing. I mean, we're rated No. 1. We have the most papers. So, I would be in awe of the hard things that this kind of scale and success lets you do, and I'd be really torn--geez, should I go over to that research group and just go help those guys, or should I learn that chairman's office-type thing where you kind of have to give people positive feedback, negative feedback, balance that well, think about people. To have a time warp would feel like such a discontinuity, like, hey, if you haven't seen code, you're not me. So, it would be confusing. Do you have a sense of what technologies are going to be important to you personally in your new role? Gates: Well, immunology is very important, because that's the science that teaches us how to make vaccines. Vaccines teach your immune system how to block the diseases. And so in the biggest foundation program, global health, the key miracles we're looking for are vaccines, a vaccine for malaria, a vaccine for tuberculosis, a vaccine for AIDS, a vaccine for pneumonia, a vaccine for the various diarrheal diseases. If you take something like education, the whole way that teachers improve and learn from each other, and what is an effective teacher and how do you encourage them to adopt best practices, that's a very complex area that I want to learn a lot about. To some degree online video can come in and play a role there, particularly as you get up to college and community college. Industry bids adieu Scott McNealy "I wish him good luck. I think he is a very smart guy. It will be nice not to have him beating up on me, but I'm glad he is doing something good. I think he has a big job ahead of him." Craig Mundie "We shook hands, and I came here as the general manager of a nonexistent division to do non-PC computing, and the rest is history, as they say." Mark Cuban "Back in the 1980s, Comdex was not just an industry confab, it was the ultimate party. I was dancing at one of the many events with a couple of girls who were clearly out of my league. All of a sudden, one of their friends comes over to us and tells me they are leaving to go to party with some guy named Bill Gates because he was worth like 60 million dollars...True story." Click for more industry farewells. Related audio Gates 'isn't evil' Ethernet co-inventor Robert Metcalfe heavily criticized Gates in the 1990s on issues of Micrsoft's anticompetitiveness. Yet, he admits he likes Gates, even if the sentiment is unreturned. loadAudio("/podcast/metcalfe.mp3"); Download mp3 (999KB) Dancing Gates memories Dan Bricklin, the co-creator of VisiCalc spread sheets talks about Gates willingness to do anything--including dancing at conferences--for his business and for the industry. loadAudio("/podcast/bricklin.mp3"); Download mp3 (3.85MB) Competing with Gates Mitch Kapor, the creator of Lotus 1-2-3 software, acknowledges Gates' early intensity and drive. loadAudio("/podcast/kapor.mp3"); Download mp3 (3.85MB) Photos Photos: A Bill Gates retrospective Through the years, Microsoft's leader has hobnobbed with everyone from the Queen to Bono--and the Albuquerque police. Video Bill Gates' last day Bono, George Clooney, and Steven Spielberg get some laughs at Gates' expense in this spoof video from CES 2008. Shifting roles News.com's Ina Fried and Kara Tsuboi take a look back at Gates' career and serve up some highlights from his recent speeches. On outflanking rivals Gates talks at CES 2008 about how Microsoft can beat rivals as software moves to the phone, TV, other devices On the future of tech In the coming years, the conference table, the whiteboard...everything will be a computer, Gates says. Why Microsoft is one up on the big Apple At CES 2007, Gates talks about how Microsoft's recent moves will trump Apple in the digital living room. Gates going, but slowly Microsoft co-founder plans his future as "the world's greatest philanthropist." The origin of PC clones At a 2001 event celebrating the PC's 20th anniversary, Gates and Compaq founder Rod Canion reflected on the events that created the modern PC business. Control-alt-delete At a 2001 event celebrating the PC's 20th anniversary, IBM engineer Dave Bradley talks about how the keystroke came to be, quipping that, though he invented it, Bill Gates made it famous. Related coverage Gates-Ballmer rifts marked Microsoft power shift (June 6, 2008) Will Microsoft be directionless without Bill Gates? (May 17, 2008) Bill Gates' to-do list (January 31, 2007) With Vista, seeing is believing, says Gates (January 29, 2007) Gates stepping down from full-time Microsoft role (June 15, 2006) The end of the Gates era (June 15, 2006) I'll have to read a lot of books and go out and do a lot of visits to play the right role in terms of strategy making and education. Then you have new areas like agriculture where I'm just amazed, you know, the way seeds work and how they can be improved. I didn't even understand fertilizer. I mean, 10 years ago, if you asked me, you know, how do you make fertilizer, I would have given you this vague thing about nitrogen, but I didn't understand where it is, why it costs money, how you apply it, how much of it drains away, could it be put in something where most of it doesn't drain away, so you don't need as much. Anyway, there are some really brilliant things that are coming along in that area, where you need far less of it. And things like cold chain (with) vaccines--what is the gating factor once you have a vaccine of actually getting it out to rural areas? It's the fact that they have to be in refrigerators the whole way, and if they ever get too cold they freeze and they're bad, and if they ever get too warm they denature and they're bad. A lot of these new vaccines we're making unfortunately are quite large, and so the refrigerator capacity of this delivery chain is nowhere near adequate for the new things that we want to put into it. So, thinking through, OK, do you do better refrigerators, do you do these super Thermos things. The answer is super Thermos things, you know, but how do you design those and what are the particular needs of developing countries. So, there's a lot of technologies, but if you had to pick one, it would be immunology. You mentioned early on there was this question of would IBM be the IBM of the software world, and it's still an important company but it doesn't occupy the role that it did. A lot is written that Microsoft is going to find itself in a similar bind? Gates: Someday they will write that Microsoft has peaked, and someday they will be right. They said we didn't understand server operating systems, and that only Sun Microsystems with Unix understood those things, and I can show you the articles. They never do follow-up articles; I don't understand why. When they predict my death, they never reincarnate me. But it's an appropriate dialogue, yes. There is a question, whenever something new happens in the industry: will the leader be agile enough to take what they're good at and this new thing, and bring them together or not? That's always fair game. People always tend to underestimate the assets that the leader has. I mean, how many times was it predicted that IBM would do well in various things? Well, heck, they did well in a lot of things for a long time. So, our core skill set is software. Software on phones is a lot the same, software in TV sets is a lot the same, software in video games is a lot the same. We've always done software for a huge variety of devices. Someday they will write that Microsoft has peaked, and someday they will be right. They said we didn't understand server operating systems, and that only Sun Microsystems with Unix understood those things, and I can show you the articles. They never do follow-up articles; I don't understand why. When they predict my death, they never reincarnate me. Google is a very strong competitor, and so people will enjoy watching whether they can be challenged. The world will be better off if they are challenged effectively, and I think there's only one company left in terms of the depth and breadth and staying power that you need (to) really give them a big challenge. Which is the bigger challenge? Is it Google the company because of their approach and their ambition and their assets and their talent, or is it the changes in the economics that's come with search and advertising and changes in software? Gates: The economics haven't changed. I mean, the economics of software are very simple. Most of the profitability is made up out of making businesses more efficient. We saw operating systems and we saw productivity software, and those are not advertising-driven things. The online is changing some of how you deliver e-mail and collaboration and those things, but we've been doing that off of servers, we have great cloud stuff that Ray (Ozzie) is driving. So, it's not really the economics. The consumer side has always been you weren't going to make a ton of money there, but you could get great exposure. So, the business dynamic is very much the same, and the amount we can save--if you think of our economic impact, by making a worker have that intelligent whiteboard and intelligent desk and be able to look at business sales trends and look at what product you should buy, how do you work with your colleague in another country, improving those things. That's the huge impact of software in these next 10 years, not whether ads gleam on the left-hand side of your computer. The breakthroughs have to do with natural user interface, data mining. Taking Office to the next level, that's way more impactful than anything about search-based advertising. I mean, Microsoft fortunately can be involved in both of those. Were you relieved or disappointed that Yahoo didn't go through? Gates: Well, I've gotten a chance to help Steve (Ballmer) as he's worked this thing through. He feels very good about that he made an offer that if they, in an enthusiastic and timely and reasonable way, had responded to that in terms of, OK, let's get going, let's keep people on both sides and mesh them in the best ways and get the regulatory review under way, get that thing going; if they had embraced that thing, he and I would have been very happy with that. They didn't, and we're very happy with our standalone strategy. So, I think it's kind of strange for people to say, oh, what a blow to us. Well, hey, we created an option that was out of our control whether or not they had the right timeliness, enthusiasm, reasonableness. That was completely in their control, that's fair. Well, it's between them and their shareholders whether that's fair, but we knew they had a choice to make, and they--during the relevant time frame they--in none of those three did they meet what would have made it make sense for us. We have a good standalone strategy. It takes longer to get scale in terms of scale of advertising, end user share, but it's all predicated on brilliant innovation. You can't have a standalone strategy or a strategy that involves any acquisition unless you're going to have a search that in important respects people view as a better search. So, it starts with something that the world at large doesn't have to believe yet but we believe, which is that we can have something that's really fantastic and competes for consumers in. If you have that, even without the acquisition, that's a great thing. It's just how do you go and get the scale? It will take you longer.

Gates' big send-off

Discuss: Gates' big send-off