Most of the companies and organizations in favor of a national VoIP (voice over Internet Protocol) policy want to
Get Up to Speed on...
Get the latest headlines and
company-specific news in our
expanded GUTS section.
"It is clear that the commission must develop a national policy framework for VoIP...in order to avoid potentially diverse and inconsistent state determinations," BellSouth attorneys wrote in that company's opinion. Other major supporters of an FCC VoIP policy include phone company SBC Communications, and Motorola, a maker of communications chips and cell phones.
The filings highlight the ongoing battle between states and federal regulators about how to govern VoIP, a cheaper form of phoning, which uses the Internet instead of a standard phone company's privately owned network. States, including, which support a state's right to impose its own regulations, fear a loss of revenue if VoIP providers don't have to pay the same fees that phone companies have been paying for decades. Federal regulators, however, are trying to coddle a new industry by not imposing financially constraining fees on these young companies.
The filings were made either in support of or against a petition from VoIP provider Vonage, which asked the FCC to pre-empt a decision by the state of Minnesota, and by extension all state overseers, to regulate Internet phone companies.
Many of those responding point out that a recentdecision in Minnesota, which permanently stalled that state's effort to regulate VoIP providers, makes the Vonage request moot. But the question is still a necessary one to answer.
"Questions relating to the regulation of IP voice services are pressing ones that the commission must address immediately," Qwest states in its response.