The Stop Online Piracy Act, a
nutty, delusional and shortsighted bill created by people who could be
construed as idiots, is hitting a buzzsaw of Internet opposition. Large
companies are also starting to tabulate their potential compliance costs.
On the surface, the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) sounds reasonable. All the legislation wants to do is stop online copyright infringement. The rub is that anyone can complain and have sites taken down and cut off from their revenue sources. Yes, you too can be a rogue site.
SOPA was introduced Oct. 26 and despite some initial outcry largely went unnoticed. A hearing with a arguably loaded deck in favor of SOPA was met by late inning resistance from AOL, eBay, Facebook, Google, LinkedIn, Mozilla, Twitter, Yahoo! and Zynga.
In a nutshell, SOPA kills the safe harbor in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). So long, safe harbor, and hello, U.S. Attorney General.
How would this work in practice?
A reader ofsums it up nicely.
I've e-mailed C|Net to notify them that that you post was plagiarized from a satire blog post of a local comedy troupe. I've asked that they ban your user ID and IP from C|Net and their affiliates (CBS Interactive, Last.fm, CBS sports, ZDnet, Chow, Clicker, GameSpot, metacritic, TechRepublic, etc.) and turn over your IP and identifying info over to the troupe so that they can sue. $150,000 isn't much, but it'll go a long way in fixing up their venue.
Thanks for playing. Credit to FellowConspirator for the witty rebuttal.
In other words, you allege and we take sites down.
Given that reality, it's no surprise that legislators are playing a bit of defense. Mozilla is urging folks to write their Congresspeople. Others call SOPA an Internet blacklist bill. The Electronic Freedom Foundation calls SOPA a disaster.
But hey, don't believe the Internet guys. MasterCard's Linda Kirkpatrick, group head of customer performance integrity, outlined how SOPA will make her company's costs surge. In her testimony, Kirkpatrick said that the time frames between an allegation and actual response are unrealistic. Kirkpatrick also has a beef with MasterCard being a copyright monitoring outpost of the U.S. Copyright Office. She said:
As the Committee moves forward with legislation to address the sale of infringing products or services over the Internet, MasterCard believes it is essential to ensure that any obligations imposed on payment systems are capable of being readily implemented through reasonable policies and procedures, and that payment systems be shielded from litigation and liability when acting in accordance with the bill's requirements.
Just what the U.S. economy needs--more acronyms to distract us from doing real work.
This post first appeared on ZDNet's Between the Lines blog.