In 1992, Nof attempted to provide an oceanographic explanation for the biblical story of the Red Sea crossing by the ancient Israelites. More recently, the Florida State University oceanographer co-published a paper (click for PDF) that offered a paleolimnological explanation for walking on water in the Sea of Galilee.
Press reports reduced the substance of his research finding to a hot headline that --including a fair share of hate mail. But Nof was careful to avoid drawing any conclusion about the New Testament account that Jesus walked on water in Lake Kinneret (known outside of Israel as the Sea of Galilee). CNET News.com recently caught up with Nof to learn more about his findings.
Q: How were you and your colleagues able to recreate the conditions that prevailed in the Galilee region 2,000 years ago?
Nof: There is now a fairly standard oceanographic technique where you can go and take cores from the bottom of the ocean--in this case, the bottom of the Mediterranean--and you look at the sediments on the bottom and you take a core that is, say, 10 meters deep--or whatever it is--and you bring it up and you look at the shells that are inside that core. And you can tell the time by where you find (items) in the core. So, you can identify shells of different animals at each depth, and you can tell from what animals the temperature of the ocean was at that time.
When you approached this question, what part of Lake Kinneret did you focus on?
Nof: Nobody drilled in the Kinneret, but people drilled in the Mediterranean, which is not that far and the air masses are very similar. We looked at some cores that were in the middle of the Mediterranean not far from Sicily...If you look at these cores, you'll see that 2,600 years ago there was a dip in temperature of several degrees. This is the temperature of the water in the Mediterranean. Now the heat capacity of water is much higher than the air. So for a drop of 4 degrees in the sea, there probably was a much larger drop in the atmosphere--at least as big.
You talk about this concept called "Springs Ice." Can you explain that?
Nof: If you look at the way that the usual river just spreads into the ocean, the river is fresh and the ocean is salty. So the river water is floating on top. That's why you see it from the air normally. With springs water it's the opposite situation: The lake is fresh and the spring is salty, so the water from the springs go to the bottom. It forms a plume on the bottom. The ice can only form above that plume--not on the entire lake. And the reason that it can form only above the plume is that the salty plume prevents convection.
When you cool fresh water from the top, usually what happens is that the water on the top gets heavier than the water below and it sinks to the bottom. So before you form ice on the top of a lake, you usually have to bring the entire lake down to fairly low temperatures.
In this particular case, you don't. The lower water can stay any temperature that it started with because nothing falls down to there. The cold temperature goes immediately to the formation of ice.
These days, the Sea of Galilee region is fairly warm. What was the average temperature during the time of Jesus?
Nof: It was probably maybe 10 degrees Fahrenheit lower than today, on average, according to these cores. I don't know how much it was. I'm telling you what we did, taking these cores to represent what happened above the Sea of Galilee.
Do you have an idea what the odds were of Springs
Ice forming in Northern Israel back then?
Nof: All we know we can say about the Kinneret is because of what we did there. We took the temperature record in the last 20 years and from that record, you know, how it varies from day to day. And we lowered the mean of that record by that temperature difference that I mentioned to you. When we lowered the mean, we got a different record, a kind of a hypothetical record, and we consider that record to be representative of what the temperature above the lake was back at that time. And from that, we computed the likelihood that there will be ice.
Nof: Well, it was not that common, and it was probably attached to the shore--very close to the shore. You know, it doesn't open and does not form in the middle of the lake. It will form next to the shore. I don't know if people noticed or not. I don't know how often it was. During this window of 100 or 200 years it was much colder. My guess is that it probably happened a few times.
Were you able to determine how long the cold spell would have lasted?
Nof: We calculated that: two or three days. That can very easily be calculated. It's not a big deal.
And how cold would the region have had to become for these formations?
Nof: I think that we decided that it needs to be minus 4 centigrade, so that will be in the 20s for three days or something like that--not that cold and not that long.
What piqued your interest in trying to examine the circumstances surrounding the story of Jesus walking on water?
Nof: Well, I did this work on the Red Sea 13 years ago about the parting of the Red Sea. We provided an explanation for that, and somehow since that time it was always in the back of my mind, well, maybe there is something that would explain that story behind Jesus.
You provided an oceanographic perspective about the parting of the Red Sea. What was your main thesis back then?
Nof: It's the wind, the effect of the wind in a very shallow part of the Red Sea that could expose a ridge that is normally covered with water. This is in the Gulf of Suez. The ridges are maybe 15 feet under the water today. Very strong wind if it blows in the right direction for a long enough time will expose this ridge. And, in fact, if you look at the biblical story there they speak about the very strong wind blowing the night before.
What has been the reaction to your most recent paper?
Nof: Well, it's very hard to tell because, you know, we don't get an average reaction of everybody. We only get the extremes--or at least I get e-mails. Most of the e-mails are negative e-mails from extremists.