X

Dallas Buyers to draft letter to pirates as ISPs foot legal bill

The Federal Court has set a deadline for Dallas Buyers Club to draft its letter to suspected pirates, but iiNet and other ISPs now face the unpleasant reality of footing the bill for the long-running legal case.

Claire Reilly Former Principal Video Producer
Claire Reilly was a video host, journalist and producer covering all things space, futurism, science and culture. Whether she's covering breaking news, explaining complex science topics or exploring the weirder sides of tech culture, Claire gets to the heart of why technology matters to everyone. She's been a regular commentator on broadcast news, and in her spare time, she's a cabaret enthusiast, Simpsons aficionado and closet country music lover. She originally hails from Sydney but now calls San Francisco home.
Expertise Space, Futurism, Science and Sci-Tech, Robotics, Tech Culture Credentials
  • Webby Award Winner (Best Video Host, 2021), Webby Nominee (Podcasts, 2021), Gold Telly (Documentary Series, 2021), Silver Telly (Video Writing, 2021), W3 Award (Best Host, 2020), Australian IT Journalism Awards (Best Journalist, Best News Journalist 2017)
Claire Reilly
3 min read

Dallas Buyers Club. Pinnacle Films

The legal letter to be sent to torrenters suspected of pirating "Dallas Buyers Club" will be drafted within a week under orders handed down in the Federal Court today.

The letter forms part of the 'preliminary discovery' process that will allow the rights holders to identify those suspected of pirating the film before suing those individuals for copyright infringement.

In handing down a judgement in the ongoing legal battle between Dallas Buyers Club and iiNet, Justice Nye Perram ordered Dallas Buyers Club to provide the final substance of any copyright infringement letter to the court by May 13. Both sides will then meet in court on May 21 to discuss the "form of any letter" sent to account holders before setting a date for preliminary discovery to begin.

Justice Perram also ordered that the ISPs involved pay 75 percent of Dallas Buyers Club's legal costs, including the cost of flying out its expert witness, Daniel Macek of MaverickEye, from Germany. Mr Macek provided testimony to vouch for Dallas Buyers Club's IP and piracy detection methods, but Justice Perram ultimately ruled that his cross-examination "served little purpose" and subsequently called on the ISPs to foot the bill for his travel.

However, the Judge has allowed the ISPs to apply for security on the costs involved with the preliminary discovery process.

What happens next?

The court has ordered iiNet, as well as a number of smaller ISPs involved in the case, to provide Dallas Buyers Club with a "verified list" of the 4,726 IP addresses earmarked by the rights holders' technical experts for copyright infringement. Alongside this, the ISPs will provide the "name and residential address of the account holder associated with that IP address" at the particular time that the IP address was detected downloading the film (or part thereof).

According to Justice Perram's judgement, Dallas Buyers Club is then permitted to use this information for "the recovery of compensation for infringement," including "suing end-users for infringement of copyright in the Film; and negotiating with end-users regarding their liability for such infringement".

In an earlier hearing in the case, lawyers for Dallas Buyers Club indicated they would seek the personal details on account holders by May 6 -- the date of today's hearing. However, this date will now be set by Justice Perram following the hearing on May 21.

When it comes to what the rights holders will do in contacting individual pirates, Dallas Buyers Club is yet to show its hand. iiNet previously asserted its right to view any communication with its customers before it is sent, while Dallas Buyers Club insisted any such letter only needed to be reviewed by the judge.

Today, Justice Perram maintained, "When the letter is in a form which is satisfactory I will then require the ISPs to give the account holder information sought to Dallas Buyers Club, on its undertaking to send a letter only in that form."

However, he also raised concerns about his "ability to secure obedience" on that front, considering Dallas Buyers Club LLC is based overseas, and ultimately called for further evidence on this issue.

While Justice Perram said it was "premature" to comment on the content of the letter, he noted that a number of factors were at play including "the range of sophistication" of potential recipients. He remarked that "it should not be assumed that every recipient has engaged in infringement" but also noted that "it would be to engage in fantasy to think that some of them have not".