However what I found was the owner was flumoxed by firewall or other settings.
Here's a thought. Ask in Cnet's Vista forum.
Bob
![]() | Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years. Thanks, CNET Support |
I love vista, its robust and is visually stunning. It has the visual feeling and responsiveness of Mac OS 10 yet with the robust performance of windows, infact i really think microsoft has copied alot of the graphic design for vista and office 2007 from the mac operating system.
However there are some major problems u should consider b4 installing Vista:
Firslty i recommend you use the dual boot system so u can boot back to XP to uninstall or change programs that don't work in in vista - and alot of programs don't work well on vista.
Expect up to 3 hrs for install of vista, better to clean install rather than upgrade.
1. Install it on a large hard drive - it requires 15G just for the op system, and don't use paritions - 6. Vista freaks out with stupid warning promtps when you copy and paste between partitions - so don't use
them
2. Have at least 1 G of ram
3. Uninstall all Norton symantec products esp norton internet security before installing upgrade of vista. It completely srews vista up and is hard to unistall from vista,esp the firewall - I use trend micro pccillin 2007 for vista
4. DISABLE USER ACCOUNTS CONTROL - this feature is stupid and so annoying in vista - its meant to stop uncontrolled use of programs from hacker and adware but i mean most good firewalls stop this anyways. These terrible prompts that come up all the time when u run programs - disable this
5. Cute FTP and WSFTp don't work on vista yet!
Discussion is locked
I'm sorry, but I just had to say this:
1. Yes, it is a good idea to dual boot. I didnt, and I dont regret it. That being said, I have only seen about 4 programs that will not install on Vista as of yet. Obviously, I dont use every program ever made, so there will be lots more.
2. It did not take me 3 hours to install, it took me less than 1 hour.
3. True, Symantec products cause some grief in vista.
4. User Accounts Control should not be disabled. Relying completely on a firewall or antivirus software is just asking for an infection.
I'm not trying to flame, but I cannot stand people making suggestions without doing research.
Did you say the "visual feeling and responsiveness" of MacOS and the *reliability* of Windows"? Yeesh!
I remember memory leak testing an application once, and being told that the leak wasn't significant enough to fix. I asked my boss why he thought it was worth fixing, and he replied: "Which platform are we designing this for?".
"32-bit Windows" I replied.
He then did a quick multiplication of the amount of memory that was leaking per day by the average number of days between blue-screens on our NT test rigs and said: "Well, a hard reboot should release a few megs back onto the heap before that becomes a problem, shouldn't it?"
...copy. Micro$oft copied Mac OS X. I have yet to see when they come up with something of their own. BTW, the original GUI was also copied from the Mac.