PC Applications forum

General discussion

Windows Defrag vs Third Party Defrag

by threeDs / November 22, 2009 8:35 AM PST

This is something I've been curious about. How does CNET (or any other technical site) determine if a third party defrag program like Smart Defrag is better than Windows Defrag. It's not clear from reading the reviews. Not that I mean to single out Windows Defrag; I just happen to be working with it today. Thanks everyone.

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Windows Defrag vs Third Party Defrag
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Windows Defrag vs Third Party Defrag
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Editor perception...
by John.Wilkinson / November 23, 2009 1:40 AM PST

Each person has his/her own perception of which application is better than another, but there are standard characteristics evaluated for each product type. For instance, defragmenters are evaluated for speed, fragmentation levels after fragmentation, the ability to defragment in the background/real-time, and the ability to even prevent fragmentation.

On a side note: Windows' defragmenter was originally a bare-bones copy of Diskeeper, though the two have been largely developed individually for the past decade or so, with Diskeeper being the 'advanced' third-party option.

Hope this helps,

Collapse -
One tid and a few bits...
by Parabraves1 / November 25, 2009 9:03 PM PST
In reply to: Editor perception...

First, *ON* point- I don't know about Vista/7, but previous Windows defraggers pretty much required you to shut down not only computer use, but computer non-use as well. Time consumption was mentioned by the editor but there's also dipping into display settings to shut down your screen saver as well. Combine the time saved using CNET downloads with the time and hassle to allow it to even work through Windows. You can now complete a necessary task many people used to fear and loathe (not necessarily in Las Vegas).

Quality of a finished process will always remain a debate around here. Some have advantages, for example I think Auslogics is the one that has a bonus download to override the screen saver, should you forget to kill it. I also believe Smart Defrag is supposedly the one that is more friendly to background-running. SD's problem is it loads at start-up and will continue to lurk after you're finished. Simple fix, obviously, but an annoyance that some apps are designed to stop. Windows has the worst of all worlds, considering you won't use it the way you need to if you're relying on it alone.

Popular Forums

Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
Laptops 21,181 discussions
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
Phones 17,137 discussions
Security 31,287 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
Windows 10 2,657 discussions


Your favorite shows are back!

Don’t miss your dramas, sitcoms and reality shows. Find out when and where they’re airing!