Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

Rant

Wiener 'exposed' again

Aug 29, 2016 3:05PM PDT

Anthony Wiener caught sexting again for the third time. His wife, Huma is separating from him........however, one of the pics has him laying in a bed in his underwear (the woman he was sexting with wrote "You know you can see your wiener in that pic, right?"....AND his six month old son is laying next to him on the bed. Does that qualify to have him charged with CHILD PORNOGRAPHY? And, if so, is that why his wife finally decided to toss him out...because HER career is on the line over this?

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
I wish someone would go chop it off
Aug 29, 2016 7:08PM PDT

...then maybe he could quit being so bothered by it.

- Collapse -
So I googled YOUR quote
Aug 29, 2016 7:30PM PDT
- Collapse -
Evidently not many, if any, liberal
Aug 30, 2016 2:47AM PDT
- Collapse -
RE:AND his six month old son is laying next to him
Aug 29, 2016 7:44PM PDT

his FIVE-YEAR-OLD SON is allegedly laying right next

- Collapse -
The first news report I heard
Aug 30, 2016 2:40AM PDT

said the child was six months old.....the next report said the son was a 'toddler' without giving an age. At the time I posted, I hadn't found a link to post yet. I can always count on you to not only correct and become my SE copywriter, JP, but to also evidently EXCUSE Wiener's behavior by not even commenting on it.

Because the child was older than I originally stated, does that mean it ISN'T child pornography in your opinion? It seems to me that having the boy be five years old instead of six months old makes it even worse, because he is of an age to actually be AWARE of his father's 'exposure' and eventually become aware of the fact that he (the son) is out there forever on the internet in that situation because of his own father.

- Collapse -
The son was FOUR at the time....
Aug 30, 2016 2:50AM PDT

does that make it better for you that he wasn't a 'baby' anymore, JP? I wonder because you used capitalized emphasis on the age rather than the actual actions of his father.

- Collapse -
The 'story" is
Aug 30, 2016 3:57AM PDT

The Weiner was Sexting with TheRUMP supporter..the 4 or 5 year old comes(NOT a 6 month old....that can't go anywhere "by himself") into the room and lays down with Dad....Dad points the phone at the kid laying beside him and he says...Look who climbed into bed with me...TheRUMP supporter remarks...You know you can see your wiener in that pic, right. THEN she says O I see you thought you posted on your TL [public timeline] not DM [direct message]. S–t happens be careful,” she added. i guess SHE wasn't THAT offended at the time...

I guess DM is for HER eyes only...and SHE didn't object "at the time"


She remains anonymous, only known as "busty brunette"

Busty brunette..... TheRUMP supporter.

Link provided upon request....

- Collapse -
So....the father
Aug 30, 2016 5:24AM PDT

puts the kid into the pic and THEN the woman comments about being able to see 'all'.....does he 'fix' himself or turn away or get off the phone immediately because he's embarrassed or worried for his kid's sake? No....the pic goes out into the world. Does that make him a candidate for arrest for child pornography because they are in bed together with his junk exposed? I hope so..........

Who CARES if she is a Trump supporter? ONLY you........I'M not the one who decided to bring Trump into this conversation, JP. What in hell does he have to do with this?

- Collapse -
RE: No....the pic goes out into the world.
Aug 30, 2016 5:34AM PDT

Thanks to TheRUMP supporter....so that makes it HIS fault?...she's the one that "put it out there"....He put it out for her...she put it out there for the world.

.I'M not the one who decided to bring Trump into this conversation, JP. What in hell does he have to do with this?

TheRUMP brought himself into it....

TheRUMP is "using this pic" to trash Hillary....busty brunette is a RUMP supporter...kept quiet since Jan 2015...remains anonymous... Wonder how much she got for the pic?

- Collapse -
How do you know she's a Trump supporter?
Aug 30, 2016 6:27AM PDT

Did SHE tell Weiner to expose himself or sext with her for 19 months to elevate Trump? Trump never even announced his running until June or July of last year....the pic was taken months before that, JP. Your logic doesn't make any sense. Trump had nothing to do with this.

How can you NOT expect ANY opponent to hilLIARy to use this pic or any others with Weiner exposing himself to bring to light the real possibility of national security issues when he is married to her right hand 'man'?

What about the child pornography issue, JP.....or does that mean nothing to you?

- Collapse -
RE:Did SHE tell Weiner to expose himself or sext with her fo
Aug 30, 2016 7:33AM PDT
Did SHE tell Weiner to expose himself or sext with her for 19 months to elevate Trump?

So you don't want to talk about the FACT that she was the one that sends pic out into the world.

And Weiner is the one guilty of "child porn"?...SHE is the distributor of "child porn" since that's what you want to call it.

Have any of your kids ever seen their father in HIS underwear? Child porn?
- Collapse -
RE:with his junk exposed?
Aug 30, 2016 5:39AM PDT

NOT "exposed"

- Collapse -
(NT) Evidently it WAS....she said so.
Aug 30, 2016 6:27AM PDT
- Collapse -
RE:Evidently it WAS....she said so.
Aug 30, 2016 7:23AM PDT

Have YOU seen the pic?

Do you want a link to the pic?

- Collapse -
No I don't need a link because
Aug 30, 2016 7:31AM PDT

the one posted doesn't necessarily reflect the fact that there may be OTHER pics that showed him exposed as she stated. Most people take more than one pic that's sent, JP.....just because THIS pic is the one she chose to 'share' doesn't mean there aren't others. I'm going by what SHE said and SHE could see his junk and warned him about it.

You are again ignoring the child pornography issue.........

- Collapse -
The pic doesn't tell the truth
Aug 30, 2016 7:38AM PDT

and her words do?

I'm going by what SHE said and SHE could see his junk and warned him about it.

She was so concerned she waited 18 months to mention it .

- Collapse -
Re: the fact that there may be OTHER pics
Aug 30, 2016 8:11AM PDT

the fact that there may be OTHER pics that showed him exposed as she stated.

OR

the fact that there may NOT be OTHER pics that showed him exposed as she stated.

- Collapse -
OK...enough of your crap already, JP
Aug 30, 2016 8:22AM PDT

IF you had read any of the messages back and forth that were in the link, you would see/read that she warned him that his junk was exposed, and that he responded in fear that this was being done over an open messages system and not privately between the two. She told him to 'be careful'.

IF he wasn't exposed, why would that conversation be taking place, JP? There is no IF there are other pics, it's obvious that there are, and that she 'shared' only one of them, but also 'shared' the messages or they wouldn't be out there already.

Logic and following the dots is a good thing...too bad your Alz has taken over so much.

Child pornography......definitely him......perhaps her, too. I don't care if both get hit. Do you? As for her, IF she hasn't 'shared' the one with his junk exposed I don't see a case against her. Yes, parents are often seen in their underwear around their children....but how many take pics of it and then share the pics with someone else? Can you at the very least admit that he is one sick puppy?

- Collapse -
RE:IF he wasn't exposed,
Aug 30, 2016 8:34AM PDT
IF he wasn't exposed, why would that conversation be taking place,

SHE has a different definition of "exposed" than you.....When she sees the outline of his junk OR something that looks like it could be....it's exposed......even though there is cloth over it......It's NOT exposed...it will never get a suntan...with cloth over it.

It's "exposed" to "YOUR imagination"

YOU don't want a link to the "pic" so...the "pic" I saw had a person wearing white underwear and a child with the face pixeled out laying in a bed.

Are you saying they doctored the pic and put underwear on when he was actually naked?
- Collapse -
Maybe Weiner can come
Aug 30, 2016 5:01PM PDT

...waggle it in front of your face, and then we can watch you pretend it didn't happen. Remember, take pictures,. to remind yourself.

- Collapse -
RE:then we can watch,
Aug 30, 2016 7:19PM PDT

then we can watch...

Voyeurism?

- Collapse -
not seen picture
Aug 31, 2016 1:34AM PDT

I have not seen the picture but I thought it was just a play on words, in this case, using his name

- Collapse -
The Good Wife in real life.
Sep 15, 2016 12:09PM PDT

Reminds me of the GQ cover with Uma Thurman in full red carpet getup, after Ethan Hawke's foolishness. Caption: Would You Cheat on This Woman?
Or a woman writer's comment on Slate, on Tiger Woods' hustling cocktail waitresses: "Cocktail waitresses? Have you seen his wife?"
Have you seen Huma?
Men are pigs.