...the way the Dems, who are too stupid to realize it's actual meaning, is using the word is to demand that Trump "prove his innocence against unfounded charges", so the burden of proof they can't offer against him will not be so noticeably weak, which Mueller just proved. Impeachment is dead for them, except Al Green is a bit too stupid to understand that, since he's failed on 3 votes from 2017 till now to get his "articles of impeachment" approved by Congress. It was defeated this last time by 3 to 1 on votes. He's a stupid glutton for punishment and embarassment it seems, LOL.
With many news outlets proclaiming that Trump was not "exonerated" of a crime, let's just look at a definition of it.
Exoneration
From the link
" In criminal context the term exonerate refers to a state where a person convicted of a crime is later proved to be innocent."
From this definition, Trump would first need to be convicted and later found not guilty. To my knowledge, except in the minds of certain people, guilt has not yet been established. Also, to my knowledge, suspicion of guilt still doesn't count. Personally, I'd like to see this come to an end and for the opposition party to focus on some sort of positive message about their own achievements rather than put the country through any more of this. If Trump has been a bad president, his performance numbers would show it.

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic