Why would an OS not do this? To me this seems very proper and a nice first line of defense.
Does anyone know why ALL my directories have the Read-Only attribute turned on? No, I didn't check EVERY single directory, but I checked scores of directories including ones I created.
I'm using a Vista Home Premium system. My system seems to work well, but this Read-Only attribute for all my directories arouses my curiosity. This must be by design, but I still wonder what purpose this serves.
Note, also, that I've also experimented with a few directories that I manually created (non-system directories) by trying to remove the Read-Only attribute. I did this by right-clicking on a directory, selecting Properties, clearing the Read-Only check mark, clicked Apply and OK. If there are sub-directories and I select the option to apply the change to all sub-directories, I even get the progress bar indicating my change is being processed. Yet after completing the change and checking again, the Read-Only attribute is still applied.
Any ideas as to why this is? Thanks, all.

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic