Reading over your angry YouTuber article. I see that a lot of it is simply slander for the sake of destroying livelihoods. When I go to ask about this, the comments are disabled.

So you can attempt to destroy lives and families, for things that are vastly different from what your portrayal is. Then when there are legitimate concerns and backlash you can't handle it.

I'm not angry at you, more curious on which company paid for the slander. Or was it multiple companies? Do you just hate youtubers? Is it professional jealousy or rivalry that youtubers sometimes gain more traction? Are you an advocate for censorship? Would you be willing to make a formal statement on the actions?

Wouldn't mind making this my first journalistic piece, all though I'll probably be just as one sided as your journilist was.

If this is not the place for these questions, let me know so I can go through the proper channels.

Discussion is locked

Reply to: Why?
PLEASE NOTE: Do not post advertisements, offensive materials, profanity, or personal attacks. Please remember to be considerate of other members. If you are new to the CNET Forums, please read our CNET Forums FAQ. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Reporting: Why?
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
- Collapse -

Who are you talking about and what are you talking about?

- Collapse -
(NT) Sorry. Wrong number.
- Collapse -
Please supply a link or article where this happened.

Unless you supply a link to that content all the members here are going to wonder what you wrote about.

Post was last edited on June 8, 2019 11:03 AM PDT

- Collapse -
(NT) ... and then we take action ...
- Collapse -

We form a committee to determine what committee we need to form.

- Collapse -
(NT) I'll get back to you on that.
- Collapse -
That's OK, I sent out a memo.
- Collapse -
Another member shared enough that I could find the article.
- Collapse -
Good thing he wasn't angry.

"I'm not angry at you" Grin

'Turning outrage into views' [into $]. More brave new world. Sad

CNET Forums

Forum Info