Who digitally supports old school 4x5 photography?

pricey but worth a look. Of course I'd have to switch cameras and that makes it even more expensive.

a bellows type 4x5. It could be the same unit I guess, but I didn't stop long enough to find out. No matter what, it's too rich for me at this point.

Thanks for the info on the Mamiya, I'm sure it is quite expensive, but also overflowing with features - most of which I am sure I won't use.
There is something about the simplicity of a 4x5, with manual adjustments, external metering and visual rather than electronic feedback that is hard to replicate in today's cameras. The world is moving very quickly these days but I don't have to so I think I'll just keep going the way I have until someone recognizes that complexity should be in the photographer' eye, not the equipment.
I can have the best lenses and cameras at a fraction of the cost of the digital vesions, I just need to go the extra step of printing and a high-res drum scan.
Of course, if I was a sports or journalist photographer...different story.

In my personal opinion, the digital camera doesn't do well in the large format and medium format camera sectors due to the cost effectiveness. Digital large and medium format cameras are currently too expensive. Instead, many professionals rather use with the film large-format camera and a expensive and good scanner. In other words, the best scanner, capacity around 20 megapixels quality, cost around $1,000 which is far less than over $ 20,000 ( minimum price of medium format digital camera ). In additions, the film still provides the better dynamic range for the cheaper costs. Many people may disagree.

it is way too low. It is quite true that many large and medium format shooters are using scanners, but the scanner that many use costs almost $20,000.