Which of these Specification better?

an Asus Laptop A507UF

Processor: i3 -7020U
Graphic Card:MX130

compared to

Asus X505ZA
Ryzen 3
Vega 3

the MX130 faster in terms or core speed (correct me if im wrong) but the i3 is such bottleneck and it looks unbalance in term of both MX130+i3, and the Price also more expensive, while Ryzen 3 and Vega 3 are quite compatible since both of their performance are balance (correct me if im wrong)

i still can't sure. please help, thanks

Discussion is locked

Reply to: Which of these Specification better?
PLEASE NOTE: Do not post advertisements, offensive materials, profanity, or personal attacks. Please remember to be considerate of other members. If you are new to the CNET Forums, please read our CNET Forums FAQ. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Reporting: Which of these Specification better?
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
- Collapse -
In my experience

A dedicated GPU even if it's the MX130 would get the slightly better gamer. But a gamer would be quite upset at having to run games on low settings (most games today) but it will run The Sims 3 and 4 very nicely.

The Ryzen with it's on CPU graphics has been a nightmare for many users as they encounter random failures during gaming. I'm going with "it's not ready."

You didn't reveal what games you want to play so I'll write this is fine for non-competive offline gaming on low settings.

As to your statement about CPU GPU bottleneck, with such a low end graphics (either model really) the bottleneck is the graphics area, not the CPU.

- Collapse -
Games on low for both. Links about that follow.
That's pretty disheartening for the gamers out there. All games were barely playable on low. A lot didn't hit 60 FPS on low. shows the MX130 trading blows with the Vega 8 but the reports I get on the outright "game crashed" on the Ryzen with it's onboard graphics has me giving the nod to the MX130 if there is no other choice.

My view is a gamer with a limited budget should not buy if they can't get into the 1050 Ti or better dedicated GPU.
- Collapse -

Really Helpful thanks, but it's needed only for Photoshop and Corel Draw. not for Gaming, for Multimedia Purpose.

the budget is limited and i can't afford 1050 for now

- Collapse -
Then the MX130.

Why? Stability. You can research as good as I can.

- Collapse -

Yup, MX130 is the choice. thanks mate

in Indonesia the price quite expensive than the Normal US price. my Friend (yes actually it's for my Friend not for me) can't afford GTX 1050 as the Price is around Rp15.000.000 = 1096 = US dollar

in US it was $899.

- Collapse -

why MX130 a bottleneck? isn't that the upgraded version of GTX 950M/960M? it's quite good imo because my old laptop is 960M and still kicking (struggling a bit with current update of softwares). but this is for Multimedia only, Photoshop and Corel Draw not for gaming

- Collapse -
- Collapse -
Don't worry

it's actually for my Friend who want to Buy a Laptop, i already learn from the links notebookcheck you provided to me, MX130 = 384 Pipeline and 960M 640 Pipeline

that's a relief because that's mean i don't need to buy a new laptop for myself since my MSI Laptop still kicking and nice.

CNET Forums

Forum Info