Cameras forum

General discussion

Which megazoom camera? Kodak or canon?

by PKidOne / March 12, 2008 7:52 AM PDT

I was deciding between 2 different megazoom cameras and I am trying to get some other opinions before I make the decision. I was trying to decide between the Kodak z812 is (the z712 is's big brother with a few more features)or the canon sx100 is. The Kodak has stabilized 12x zoom, 8 megapixels, and manual controls. The reviews i've read have said it tooks really good photos though with of course a few flaws. The bad side is the battery that is required for it is around the $30 dollars, and the charger another $30 unless you buy an off brand set. The canon has only 10x stabilized zoom but also 8 megapixels. 10x vs 12x isn't terribly important but what I don't like is it does not have an optical view finder and cnet said between shots with flash, the camera could have about a 5 second pause which might be too long. This camera also has manual controls as well. They both look like great cameras but I don't know. Tell me what you think. Thanks

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Which megazoom camera? Kodak or canon?
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Which megazoom camera? Kodak or canon?
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Kodak - Canon
by snapshot2 Forum moderator / March 12, 2008 8:42 AM PDT

Something to think about.

I don't see why the type of battery is a concern.
The Kodak should come with a battery and charger.
The battery should last over 5 years and the charger should last as long as the camera.

The lack of a viewfinder would be a concern for me too.

When you use flash, the camera must recharge the high voltage flash capacitor. How long it takes is dependent on several things.
1. How fresh is the battery? A recently recharged battery will recharge the flash capacitor sooner.
2. How far you are from the subject. If you are a long way, the flash must be stronger which will almost deplete the charge on the high voltage capacitor. That means it would take longer to recharge.
3. The design of the camera:
It is possible to recharge the capacitor in a fraction of a second, but that can cause the battery to overheat if you took several photos quickly. So the manufacturer chooses a safe recharge time for their camera.
Note: most cameras will take flash shots faster if you use "burst" or continuous mode.

...
..
.

Collapse -
Kodak is stupid with batteries
by PKidOne / March 12, 2008 2:14 PM PDT
In reply to: Kodak - Canon

I the flash lag isn't all that big of the problem, but I am really concerned about the lack of a view finder. As far as the kodak and batteries, unfortunately the package contents of the camera only comes with a one time lithium ion battery which is not rechargable. The batteries can be purchased but for $30 on top of another $30 for a charger! that adds $60 right there and that is not very pleasing. but the Canon has less zoom and no electronic view finder.... Idk

Collapse -
Kodak Batteries
by snapshot2 Forum moderator / March 13, 2008 12:56 AM PDT

I was not aware that Kodak was doing that.
Bummer.

To get the features of the Canon SX100IS and get a viewfinder (and other features), you need to look at the Canon S5 IS.

The SX100IS was brought out to compete with some lower cost long zoom cameras introduced by other camera companies.
It was designed to fit a cost bracket.
Some features were eliminated (e.g. viewfinder).

...
..
.

Collapse -
Canon S5
by PKidOne / March 13, 2008 4:05 AM PDT
In reply to: Kodak Batteries

i had looked into that Canon camera as well but I really did not want to end up spending that much money on a camera. Each camera has it's disadvantages and advantages. I just haven't decided on which ones are most and least importatnt.

Collapse -
Size matters
by jmelgar / March 12, 2008 10:12 AM PDT

I own an SX100, although the flash reciclyng is very slow, I love to carry around in the same case I used in my old 4x zoom digicam.

Popular Forums
icon
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
icon
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
icon
Laptops 21,181 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
icon
Phones 17,137 discussions
icon
Security 31,287 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
icon
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
icon
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

CNET FORUMS TOP DISCUSSION

Help, my PC with Windows 10 won't shut down properly

Since upgrading to Windows 10 my computer won't shut down properly. I use the menu button shutdown and the screen goes blank, but the system does not fully shut down. The only way to get it to shut down is to hold the physical power button down till it shuts down. Any suggestions?