Cameras forum

General discussion

Which is a better idea?

by J4R3D / September 18, 2008 12:32 PM PDT

I have a Canon Rebel XSI and I'm looking for the best Lens or combination of lenses for an all around experience. I'm not really interested in Telephoto work... mostly just low light instances and portraits. I don't have the money for any kind of the L series of Canons line so with that being said, here is what I'm thinking about:

I already kinda started my upgrade process... I just a bought the 17-85mm (4-5.6) lens, then I planned on getting the 50mm (1.4) lens. Both of those combined I figured would give me all I needed.

However... I've already been seconded guessing my decision and thought about getting the 17-55mm with the constant 2.8 which should be everything I would want in just one lens.

I didn't go the 17-55mm route to begin with because the price of the lens is really more than I wanted to spend on ONE lens... but a lot of people say its a great lens. Carrying more than one lens around with me was never a concern. I planned on only carrying the 17-85mm around during the day and the 50mm around at night. But with the 17-85mm with a minimum aperture of 4, which I thought would be fine, it's really only from 17-23mm... and 50-85mm is all 5.6... which is a little upsetting. I tired taking a photo of a drivers license in my home and I ending up having to switch to manual focus just to take a the photo even with the flash enabled.

Also with the 50mm (1.4) I've heard a few stories about the Auto Focus switch breaking which isn't very exciting. That's the only downside I've heard about it.

On eBay I can get the 17-55mm for about $900 used.

I spent $350 for the 17-85mm new.

And I should be able to get the 50mm for less than $325 used.

SO whats the better idea?

Or if you have a better idea, please share.

Thanks. Sorry this is long.

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Which is a better idea?
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Which is a better idea?
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Consider
by HTHMAN / September 18, 2008 1:50 PM PDT

Pick up a used 50mm f/1.8 for your low light work. That is only about a 1/2 f-stop slower than the 1.4. There are lots of them around and you should be able to find a good one under $100. It will be as sharp and probably sharper than the 17-55 zoom.

Collapse -
thanks for the reply.
by J4R3D / September 18, 2008 3:52 PM PDT
In reply to: Consider

Maybe I phrased my explanation wrong...

I want to know which would be best:

Going with a 50mm AND the 17-85mm

or

Only going with the 17-55mm.

I like the 17-55mm be able to zoom and still have an aperture of 2.8 for low light. Is it worth it to sell my 17-85, scrap getting a 50mm, and go with this?

Also I'm not a pro or anything, it's just for fun. I just got into photography.

Collapse -
depends on what you shoot
by kalel33-20416052469708587370302374692233 / September 18, 2008 9:41 PM PDT
In reply to: thanks for the reply.

If your going to want to do portraits then I'd go with the 50mm F1.4 with the 17-85, but if you just want the best overall performer then the 17-55 is the way to go. Caveat for the 17-55, it's beast of a lens to carry around all the time. The weight and size are what would keep me from buying it. I went the first way with buying my carry around lens as the cheap and have the 50 F1.4 for indoors. I'd like to add the 85 F1.8 sometime for a better portrait, and keep the 50mm. I tried the 50 F1.8 and it's focus motor was too slow and the step focus was not always the most accurate.

If I would have been you, I would have went with the 18-55 plus the 55-250 lens, which would have been the same price as your 17-85(without losing IQ) and cost the same. I would have then added primes for specific situations. I would love a 17-55 plus a 70-200 F2.8, but those two are too heavy and bulky for traveling or hiking.

Popular Forums
icon
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
icon
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
icon
Laptops 21,181 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
icon
Phones 17,137 discussions
icon
Security 31,287 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
icon
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
icon
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

The Samsung RF23M8090SG

One of the best French door fridges we've tested

A good-looking fridge with useful features like an auto-filling water pitcher and a temperature-adjustable "FlexZone" drawer. It was a near-flawless performer in our cooling tests.