Speakeasy forum

General discussion

Where there's smoke...

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Where there's smoke...
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Where there's smoke...
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
(NT) (NT) This is scarey :-(

In reply to: Where there's smoke...

Collapse -
Why?

In reply to: (NT) This is scarey :-(

If the grants are funding needed services provided by bona fide charities, how is that any different than federal grants to secular charities that provide similar services? Nobody seemed to express much concern over NARAL's support for Elliot Spitzer who then went on a rampage against providers offering abortion alternatives (that might have cut into their profits). How is that any different than the "Reverend" Jesse Jackson's active party affiliation and campaigning and multimillion dollar grants to his various "education funds" -- for which to date he cannot even provide an accurate accounting but remains untouched lest he unleash his race rhetoric on federal prosecutors. Just ONE of those grants was for over half a million dollars for his organization merely to enlist people in a healthcare program for the poor! Sheesh! As I recall, the numbers of families this grant resulted in enrollment pitifully low.

Why should people of faith not also enjoy the same free speech enjoyed by everybody else in the political arena. I'm not for government funding of charities at the federal level, period. But so long as it exists, there is no reason to discriminate against religious charities in favor of secular charities, especially since in many areas, such as drug rehab, the former have a better proven trackrecord of success.

Evie Happy

Popular Forums

icon
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
icon
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
icon
Laptops 21,181 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
icon
Phones 17,137 discussions
icon
Security 31,287 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
icon
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
icon
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

REVIEW

Sublime suburban chariot

High on style and technology, the 2019 Volvo XC90 is an incredibly satisfying everyday crossover.