Most low cost small cameras are peas in a pod.
They suffer from a small sensor, and too many pixels.
More pixels mean smaller pixels, which means less light per pixel, which means poor low light photography.
Twelve meg of pixels is the highest pixel count you want on these small cameras.
A few cameras were designed by engineers (not salesmen).
They have 12 or less meg pixels
A larger sensor and a slightly larger diameter lens.
A brighter lens (f/1.8 or brighter)
The smaller the lens f-rating the brighter the lens. (i.e. f/1.2 is brighter than f/1.![]()
They do not have big zoom because bright lens plus big zoom means big cost.
They are few and far between.
They fall into the $350 - $400 price range.
Canon G16
Nikon P340
Panasonic LX7
Hey! I've had my old Nikon 9600-something and my P500 for a few years. However, at the time, I really didn't care so much about the quality of the pictures. They were budget cameras with high zooms and specs, and that's really all I knew to look for.
Now, I still don't really know what to look for; I know that a bigger sensor, not necessarily with a higher resolution, means higher definition.
So I'm looking for a new camera. Here's what I want:
* Under 500 dollars (the lower the better)
* High quality and definition (good enough to view at 1080P and still look good)
* I don't care if it's DSLR or digital, or maybe something like a Nikon1
* Good under low light would be nice, but it's not at all required
* No bloatware; I don't want a touchscreen, WiFi, or Facebook. If it has those things, I don't care, but I won't use them.
Any ideas?

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic