![]() | Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years. Thanks, CNET Support |
Discussion is locked
for being a liar and adulterer?
click here to email semods4@yahoo.com
To commit adultery in the White House and lie.
And probably won't be the last.
JMO
Roger
click here to email semods4@yahoo.com
The saddest truth is that this particular cult of Republicans chose to expose the fact of blow-jobs to the little boys and girls of the whole world. How do you suppose they took, and still do take, this premature knowledge? Where is safety from the neos? Who is not to be sacrificed?
-->
its ok to commit adultery, lie,
so your lieing dosnt mean anything to you?
i can see why you wanted Kerry in office another coward and a liar.
you have high standards ill stick with mine i dont lie
but not impeachable offenses.
I've often said that Clinton would have been considered a good president if he didn't have the morals of an alleycat (esp. in this day and age).
I remember JFK Jr. saying that his father probably wouldn't have run for president today because of today's spotlight.
click here to email semods4@yahoo.com
... is an entirely different issue. Leaving aside that any CEO or college administrator would have been out on their **** without a hearing for carrying on with Lewinsky at all, a court decided that the Paula Jones case against him had enough merit to go forward. Clinton deliberately sought to deny her her rights (and think what anyone may of Jones, she has/had rights too) by lying under oath.
If not for the dress, Clinton was prepared to have the full spin machine out to smear Lewinsky as some wide-eyed crazed stalker. This, more than anything, calls HIS versions of accounts into question.
Impeachment aside, I do believe that the 60 Minutes interview the Clintons gave before the election had the intent of assuring the American people that whatever his prior dalliances, he would not be repeating that while in office as President.
Evie ![]()
engages in obstruction of justice. Not commiting adultery would be nice, and let's hope there's not another generation of kids who are taught the fine points of lying by the President.
but im just stateing the fact as hes not lilly white
he was stupid enough to get cought just like tricky ****.
You can only hope to absorb them and live accordingly.
>>...violence is ... a descending spiral,
begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy.
... adding deeper darkness
to a night already devoid of stars.>>
.
again, violence starts in the mind.
It then spread it wings to intimidate and provoke.
The final product is called CRIMES.
CL
seems to be working. If you have paid attention to the last couple of weeks/months, deaths of Americans are way down, The 'insurgency' seems to be petering out after some high profile arrests. The Iraqi people are fed up with the so-called "insurgents". The new Iraqi government is starring to jell and is gaining respect. Businesses are starting to thrive. Don't want to jinx anything, but at the 2 year mark there are many successes.
The naysayers and tear-downers are losing this one.
Once we do, there will be less courses to stay.
I too look for positives in this war. But you have to look at all aspects of it. Playing the Pollyanna is stupid. The reports are mixed with both good and bad. We have to accept both. It really does pay to read different opinions, there are more sides than just ours.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A48306-2005Mar18.html
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/03/16/iraq/main680714.shtml
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/northphoenix/articles/0319PHX-soldier19Z3.html
http://www.bpf.org/html/whats_now/2005/iraq.html
tens of thousand iraqis dead, what it dosent say is there dead because saddam killed them
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=ourWorldNews&storyID=7772101
http://massgraves.info/
http://www.usaid.gov/press/mediaadvisories/2004/ma040722.html
http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2003/s1013827.htm
theres more to read try to remember
the war was right bush was right were right.
I do look at all sides. And I conclude that overall things are getting better.
The reports are mixed with both good and bad. We have to accept both. It really does pay to read different opinions, there are more sides than just ours.
Posted by: xerpor
Thanks for sharing the links. It helps cut my time from searchng.
Now I am going to read and see whether it's possible to balance the scale. ![]()
CL
of both sides along with a few others here in SE who make the same claim would be easier to swallow if you guys would actually post the good once in a while to counter-balance the fact that what you post for 'headlines' are always the bad.
TONI
NEW YORK In today's USA Today, Elliot Blair Smith hailed the openly opinionated press in Iraq, reporting on nearly 200 newspapers "reflecting a broad spectrum of viewpoints" unthinkable during the regime of Saddam Hussein. This week, for example, some "poked fun" at the new National Assembly's hasty retreat from its chambers with mortars exploding outside.
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000846145
Nearly 300 Marines and sailors are scheduled to return today to Camp Pendleton, finishing a deployment in Iraq.
About 190 of the Marines are from a supply management unit of the 1st Force Service Support Group, 1st Marine Expeditionary Force. They spent seven months helping with security operations in Anbar province.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/northcounty/20050309-9999-1mi9briefs.html
I did hear that it's getting more difficult to recruit suicide bombers. Killing off that gene pool.
click here to email semods4@yahoo.com