17 total posts
But I am really amazed by how well
they were able to forecast the path of the storm even days in advance. When I saw the projected path early on showing Wilma would make a sharp right turn entering the gulf and bear down on southern Fl. I said "No way!". When it did exactly that, I still said "No way!" Perhaps this lends credence to the notion these things can be steered. Ok, George, whose next?
Yeah that track was whacky ...
... they also predicted how quickly she would accelerate after the stall in Mexico was over. Must be some plot to show how competent Jeb Bush is to boost his candidacy in '16.
They'll keep it up right up to the time one of them gets decapitated by a flying stop sign or mashed by a 2 ton falling palm tree.
One of the FNC reporters ...
... came awfully close to that happening today, as well as a different one during Katrina. I heard (played the audio on the radio) Al Roker took one for the team on the Today Show. Funniest thing was the reporter commenting on how nuts the person was who was "actually driving in this weather if you can believe it!" while he was barely audible and having considerable trouble standing and dodging debris. Absurd!!
Just the news
Weather or natural events are the "wild cards" of news as anything can happen. Plus it fills yet another void in the news hungary monster of a 24x7 world. -----Willy
I usually have FNC on in the background ...
... not really "watching" but it's background noise unless I have a good talk radio show on the internet I can listen too. I think I have a permanent optical illusion burned into the peripheral vision area of my retina of the hurricane radar animations!
That's how Dan Rather struck it big, Evie...
so everyone figures it may be their ticket to New York City!
-- Dave K, Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email firstname.lastname@example.org
The opinions expressed above are my own,
and do not necessarily reflect those of CNET!
(NT) I thought he started by covering the Kennedy assassinat
It's been like that for a long time now.
What is it that you want to see or hear? Do you miss something? If there is something you don't want to watch just hit the power buttom on the TV or switch channel.
Don't you realize that it's stupid?
Don't you think that we could do without it? Maybe substitute coverage that ISN'T stupid?
(NT) Reporters Wanted, Common sense not required.
I applaud them!
I have many close family members, including my sister, scattered around the state. Also, a large number from my hometown retired there. Thus I certainly want to know how severely the areas are being impacted. Just hearing "100 mile winds" doesn't do it for me.
In addition, there are residents there who opt to "ride it out". However, some long-timers did evacuate because of what they saw on TV in the Katrina and Rita coverage.
The reporters did all they could to warn the communities on the east coast of what was coming. A picture is worth a thousand words, as the old saying goes.
click here to email
We can get the idea ...
... by the bending of trees and flying debris. Do we really need to risk decapitating a reporter? I've seen large pieces of stuff fly by and there is no way had it been just a foot or two left or right the reporter could get out of the way.
Yes, I do.
But I suspect I'm dense.
Those reporters have a producer or two right there off camera watching for flying objects. They have made that very clear to viewers.
Just like there are unthinking people who try to surf during storms, there are those who venture out on the streets when they shouldn't. As Key West was being hit, there was a young man, obviously 3 sheets to the wind, who was dancing down the street.
Now the coverage is on the Northeaster.
click here to email
Just once I'd like to see one INSIDE...
Looking out a window, saying, "only an idiot would go out in that."
I saw Al Roker being blown off his feet yesterday. A reminder of how stupid network "news" is.