Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

Webcam as an alternative to camcorder?

Oct 29, 2007 12:32AM PDT

I am interested in knowing if a webcam will be a cheap alternative or backup for video recording meetings and interviews I am doing as part of my research. In order to make a decision, I am trying to get an understanding of the differences between a webcam and camcorder. I would appreciate if someone could help me out here. The following is what I have ascertained so far:

1. Assuming I'm not using HDV, it seems that my $30 Microsoft LifeCam VX-1000 has the same framerate (30fps) and resolution (640*480) as a standard camcorder.

2. It seems that one thing is definitely different is the data transfer rate, which I understand is 3.6 Mbs, for camcorders, but much less for webcams, though I do not have the specs for my webcam. (If anyone knows, please fill me in.)

Can someone verify if this information is accurate, and if so, let me know what I would be sacrifing in terms of the quality of the picture. I am less interested in portability issues (naturally, for instance, a webcam needs to be connected to a laptop) or features that I may be losing (e.g., zoom).

Discussion is locked