Speakeasy forum

General discussion

We've long known that gravity sucks,

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: We've long known that gravity sucks,
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: We've long known that gravity sucks,
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
I have to wonder just how sensitive this device is

In reply to: We've long known that gravity sucks,

to slight tremors...perhaps even a butterfly landing on the tube. Scientists are a different breed. If they can solve this problem, I wonder why they still can't make an oven that will allow you to stomp around in the kitchen and not flatten a cake baking inside of it.:)

Collapse -
As to the cake:`

In reply to: I have to wonder just how sensitive this device is

From a long-ago comic strip:
'So, Mr. Scientist, how come string beans are stringy and lima beans are limey and green beans are green?'
'Well, we really don't know.'
'Then how can we believe you about anything else when you don't know beans?'

Seriously, I think the long wavelength differences mean only g waves will be sensed.

Collapse -
i wonder if these are the same scientists

In reply to: We've long known that gravity sucks,

who put electrodes in a bowl of jelly (jello?) and said "we found signs of life, the waves we recorded are similar to brainwaves"....
UK circa 1965


Collapse -
Gravity.... sucks, anti-gravity...... ?

In reply to: We've long known that gravity sucks,

Patent issued for anti-gravity device

WASHINGTON, Nov. 9 (UPI) -- The U.S. patent office has reportedly granted a patent for an anti-gravity device -- breaking its rule to reject inventions that defy the laws of physics.

The journal Nature said patent 6,960,975 was granted Nov. 1 to Boris Volfson of Huntington, Ind., for a space vehicle propelled by a superconducting shield that alters the curvature of space-time outside the craft in a way that counteracts gravity.

One of the main theoretical arguments against anti-gravity is that it implies the availability of unlimited energy.

"If you design an anti-gravity machine, you've got a perpetual-motion machine," Robert Park of the American Physical Society told Nature.

Park said the action shows patent examiners are being duped by false science
Collapse -

In reply to: Gravity.... sucks, anti-gravity...... ?


They dont really have a name for it, yet. I havent heard anybody call it 'anti-gravity' and it may not be 'anti-gravity'. I hope time will soon tell.
Collapse -

In reply to: Gravity.... sucks, anti-gravity...... ?

Popular Forums

Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
Laptops 21,181 discussions
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
Phones 17,137 discussions
Security 31,287 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
Windows 10 2,657 discussions


Best Black Friday Deals

CNET editors are busy culling the list and highlighting what we think are the best deals out there this holiday season.