Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

Rant

Watched Trump at his "press conference"

Feb 16, 2017 12:33PM PST

I thought.... him, on Dr Phil's couch, would have been a more appropriate setting for certain segments....

He was "venting"/not responding to the questions that were asked......... in MY opinion..

Deep breathes Donald,...Deep breathes....It ain't over yet...

The Orange Tornado will be letting it ALL hang out at his "rally" on Saturday?

Of course the whole "press conference" today could just be the "weight in"/hype where the combatants pose with their fists up in each others faces

TheRUMP vs The Press...

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
FWIW. I think the press needs learn how to
Feb 16, 2017 12:46PM PST

lose without turning into crybabies. Personally, I'd rather hear questions relevant to the topic than watch news outlets compete for the best "Gotcha!". I thought these White House press conferences were to get information out to the people and not to hear reporters question the president's sanity. If that needs to be done, let the people do that themselves. I'm tired of watching these elite media types do little more than flex their own muscles.

- Collapse -
RE:I'm tired of watching these elite media types
Feb 16, 2017 1:13PM PST

I'm tired of watching these elite media types do little more than flex their own muscles.

By "elite media types" you mean the "news/fake news"?

Fake news?....WHO would start that story?

irresistible force meets an immovable object?

- Collapse -
(NT) Fake News.....credit hilLIARY since she came up with it
Feb 17, 2017 2:29AM PST
- Collapse -
RE:Fake News.....credit hilLIARY since she came up with it
Feb 17, 2017 3:23AM PST

Well, I'll bet she's kicking herself now...For not getting the term copyrighted..She could make a fortune off of TheRUMP.

CIC?

Crybaby In Chief?

- Collapse -
The only reason
Feb 17, 2017 10:25AM PST

she's kicking herself is because she headed up the cheerleading squad for Trump to win the nomination because she (and others) believed he was the easiest one to beat and she'd be a shoo-in. Yep, she's definitely the CIC in this case.

- Collapse -
RE:she headed up the cheerleading squad for Trump to win
Feb 17, 2017 11:37AM PST

Her AND Putin?

Trump?...he got by, with a little help from his friend (Putin)/ and enemies (Hillary) .

RE:Yep, she's definitely the CIC in this case.

It didn't look like HER on the boob tube yesterday...looked more like TheRUMP, she would never let her hair go like that....and those hand gestures of his.....

.Donald "I inherited a mess" Trump.....


Don't worry Donnie, I have no doubt you'll leave a bigger mess.

- Collapse -
You're still buying into
Feb 17, 2017 1:31PM PST

the Russian connection even though there has been NO proof or even a little bit of evidence that Putin was able to move any votes to Trump? Good grief.....

And yes, with some of her tweets she's been crying pretty much......she's mostly crawled into the woodwork like the roach she is, and good riddance.

BO claimed during his first campaign that to have a $5T National Debt was un-American and unpatriotic..........and yet he left with four times that amount and nobody says a word....and a world literally in terrorist chaos everywhere you look. Trump had nothing to do with any of that so do you consider that to be a mess HE has inherited? Take your time and really think about how you answer, JP.

- Collapse -
re:BO claimed during his first campaign that to have a $5T N
Feb 17, 2017 7:54PM PST
BO claimed during his first campaign that to have a $5T National Debt was un-American and unpatriotic..........and yet he left with four times that amount and nobody says a word

Maybe he "SAID THAT"...BUT...It wasn't $5 T when HE began...It was closer to $10 T AND national debt wasn't quadrupled when he left.

Note the "source"

America’s Economy Before Obama Versus After Obama

The federal debt has doubled from $9.99 trillion at the end of FY 2008 (September 30, 200Cool to $19.95 trillion at the end of FY 2016

AND

The two metrics which show nominal improvement–the unemployment rate and median annual income


here is another source for comparison...
- Collapse -
When he WAS campaigning
Feb 18, 2017 3:48AM PST

He DID say it was $5T even if he got the actual number wrong, BUT it took 43 presidents to get to that point whereas HE doubled it in 8 years ALL BY HIMSELF, and nobody has said a word, even the media, that he was un-American or unpatriotic.

As for the nominal improvement in the unemployment rate....we've already discussed how those numbers are fudged because even the most dishonest reports show that we have the lowest participation rate in the workforce at the very least since Carter's term.  As for the median annual income, most 'normal' families have seen that figure take a hit by nearly $3000 per year since 2008 (and that's blamed on not only businesses not giving raises but also Obamacare).  Families took not only a hit on not getting regular raises and the Obamacare premiums that many were now forced into buying, but those premiums have doubled or tripled in many cases so they are taking triple hits on their spending income.  BO said each family would 'save' $2500 per year in healthcare cost (insurance), but he neglected to add that not only would that be a lie, but that the plans he was forcing on people would have deductibles so high that unless you have a catastrophic illness or injury, you have 'wasted' coverage because you never get to put in a claim in the first place.  How often does a family spend over $12,000 in DEDUCTIBLES EACH YEAR in ADDITION to the outrageous premiums?  And yet that's how each of the Obamacare plans are set up.

- Collapse -
RE: HE doubled it in 8 years
Feb 18, 2017 4:33AM PST

So now you agree/admit it didn't QUADRUPLE. Thank you.

RE:ALL BY HIMSELF,

Where were The Republicans?

RE:He DID say it was $5T even if he got the actual number wrong,

HE didn't "get the number wrong" people weren't listening...He said Bush ADDED $5 Trillion...The Debt WAS approx $5T before Bush + approx $5 T under Bush = $10 T That's what Obama inherited

Since Bush was Pres BEFORE Obama AND Bush ADDED slightly over $ 5 TRILLION over HIS term

Bush ADDED $5.849 trillion, a 101 percent increase from the $5.8 trillion debt at the end of Clinton's last budget, FY 2001.

Obama Added $7.917 trillion, a 68 percent increase from the $11.657 trillion debt at the end of George W. Bush’s last budget, FY 2009.

U.S. Debt by President: By Dollar and Percent

Once you're "in debt" the slope gets steep, very quickly...any visions of a $30 Billion "wall"...from someone that is eyeball deep in debt could be a pipe dream.

- Collapse -
RE:As for the nominal improvement in the unemployment rate..
Feb 18, 2017 6:42AM PST

RE:As for the nominal improvement in the unemployment rate....we've already discussed how those numbers are fudged

So WHEN/IF the "numbers improve" under the rule of TheRUMP...people should/will not be boasting about the unemployment rate dropping?

OR

Is TheRUMP working on a method that will "UNfudge the numbers"?


In the meantime

Thank you for admitting there was an improvement in the numbers UNDER Obama....even IF some disagree with the methodology.....

- Collapse -
You DO realize
Feb 18, 2017 11:32AM PST

that any increases in employment are temporary/seasonal jobs that get readjusted downward when the season is over, right? And you DO realize that the majority of the jobs being boasted about by the left are PART-TIME (some people who have TWO part-time jobs get counted TWICE which makes the numbers look even better), right?

- Collapse -
RE:You DO realize
Feb 18, 2017 1:40PM PST
You DO realize hat any increases in employment are temporary/seasonal jobs that get readjusted downward when the season is over, right? And you DO realize that the majority of the jobs being boasted about by the left are PART-TIME (some people who have TWO part-time jobs get counted TWICE which makes the numbers look even better), right?

That's the rights defense?...the methodology?

AND you DO realize TheRUMP will use the same methodology to "brag" about HIS "figures"? (IF there is anything to brag about)

One side is bias and the other isn't?

The figures don't lie?
- Collapse -
We all just misunderstood what Obama meant
Feb 18, 2017 6:52AM PST

when he said he'd not put the huge debt on the backs of our children. What he really meant was that they'd not need to pay back their large student loans. We just didn't get it at the time. Wink

- Collapse -
RE: What he really meant
Feb 18, 2017 7:16AM PST

What he really meant was that they'd not need to pay back their large student loans.

EVERYONE?

Is this what you are referring to?

EVERYONE

IF/WHEN

If you suffer from a disability that can be expected to result in your death, is expected to last for 60 months, or has lasted for 60 months, you may be eligible for federal loan discharge under the

Public Service Loan Forgiveness (“PSLF&rdquoWink allows a current borrower to have the unpaid balance of loans received under the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program forgiven after making 120 qualifying payments on the loans while working full time in public service.

and on and on with "qualifiers" to not repay...

Death seems the easiest way to NOT repay the loan...

- Collapse -
PS
Feb 18, 2017 7:31AM PST
The U.S. Government Is Collecting Student Loans It Promised to Forgive

The U.S. Department of Education has two quite different roles in the lives of indebted former students. The same bureaucracy that must safeguard taxpayer dollars by collecting $1.1 trillion in loans also oversees the nation's largest-ever effort to forgive student debt.

These dual roles have culminated in a strange situation. The Obama administration has repeatedly promised that borrowers eligible to have their student loans cancelled would be reimbursed for "every penny." But for months, the Education Department has been actively working to collect on federal student debt owed by tens of thousands of former students at Corinthian Colleges Inc.,
- Collapse -
Which is why the Dept of Ed needs to go....
Feb 18, 2017 11:40AM PST

permanently and turn control back over to the States and the banks that are in a better position to decide who qualifies for loans to begin with.

A great way to collect revenue would be if the IRS actually did their job as well by starting with garnishing wages of those in that dept that haven't paid taxes in years and owes billions....as well as many other Federal government employees who have been 'let off the hook' by ignoring them for far too long. I understand that many Federal contractors also owe millions in taxes and haven't been harassed to pay up. If the IRS can take away 'normal' citizens' incomes, homes, cars, bank accounts, etc. why is it so hard to police your own scofflaws when you already have their payroll records and checks so readily available to you? You just have to look across your desk instead of searching for them.

- Collapse -
RE:Which is why the Dept of Ed needs to go.
Feb 18, 2017 11:52AM PST

Since some think the Dept of Education "needs to go" can I take it that some previous Trump supporters disagree with Trump appointing a Secretary of Education?

- Collapse -
Have you considered
Feb 19, 2017 2:21AM PST

the possibility that the sole reason she was appointed was to dismantle that department and use her successful business experience to do it efficiently by sending the authority back to the States and then go back to her life (that includes being a long time advocate for charter and private school choice)?

- Collapse -
You didn't get it, did you?
Feb 18, 2017 8:43AM PST

What I really mean, that is.

- Collapse -
RE:You didn't get it, did you?
Feb 18, 2017 11:35AM PST

I thought I did...you were complaining about Obama cancelling the repayment of student loans....

and I showed links that show they were repaying them by providing a service to the government/public for repayment for their loans. OR how dying could release a debtor from repayment...

RE:What I really mean, that is.

Perhaps you could enlighten me...I'm NOT ESL but speak slowly...

- Collapse -
Nope...not about the loans
Feb 18, 2017 2:56PM PST

You didn't get it. Hint. "that's not what I meant....here's what I really meant".

- Collapse -
RE:here's what I really meant"
Feb 18, 2017 9:07PM PST
- Collapse -
Wrong again....let me susplain
Feb 19, 2017 3:27AM PST

During Obama's first campaign, he promised to bring down the debt by 1/2 in his first term saying that he'd be a one term president if he failed at that. He said it was wrong to put that debt on our children. Later one, his focus turned to student loan debt promising government help. Thus, he could say that the debt on the back of the children wasn't the national deficit but their own debt. It's nothing he actually flipped on, however, but just a way politicians learn to use "alternate facts" at their own convenience. "I know that's what I said but it's not what wanted it to mean."

- Collapse -
RE: he promised to bring down the debt by 1/2 i
Feb 19, 2017 4:48AM PST

RE: he promised to bring down the debt by 1/2 in his first term saying that he'd be a one term president if he failed at that.

Did Obama say of the national debt, “If I don't have this done in three years, then there's going to be a one-term proposition”?

"Today I'm pledging to cut the deficit we inherited by half by the end of my first term in office,"

Note the phrase "we inherited" was removed from the ad’s version.

And the president is speaking about the Troubled Asset Relief Program, not halving the deficit.

We should note there’s been a troubling trend this election season of campaigns splicing together unrelated or out-of-context video of a candidate’s statements.

- Collapse -
Unfortunately most liberals
Feb 19, 2017 5:20AM PST

either don't know the difference between the NATIONAL DEBT and the DEFICIT or they choose to ignore/blend the two as meaning the same thing.

NATIONAL DEBT = what we usually borrow for agendas that the DEFICIT doesn't cover (such as the wars or additional stimulus/bailouts, student loans once the Federal government took it over, and the $85B per month that the Treasury was dumping into Wall Street).

DEFICIT = the annual budget amounts for government spending which also includes items such as stimulus or additional social programs (like increasing unemployment benefits from 26 weeks to 99 weeks, increasing the SS Disability payments, additional welfare benefits, Obamacare, etc.)

BO promised to cut the DEFICIT in half.....and he DID....HOWEVER....it wasn't the BUSH deficit that he cut in four years, but HIS OWN. The DEFICIT at the end of BUSH's term was around $500B but the very first year and for the next three years of BO's budgets were ALL over $1 TRILLION.

- Collapse -
RE:DEFICIT = the annual budget amounts for government spendi
Feb 19, 2017 5:38AM PST

DEFICIT = the annual budget amounts for government spending which also includes items such as stimulus or additional social programs (like increasing unemployment benefits from 26 weeks to 99 weeks, increasing the SS Disability payments, additional welfare benefits, Obamacare, etc.)

Here's the definition of "deficit" that I use...

def·i·cit the amount by which something, especially a sum of money, is too small

IF I earn/take in less than I spend...I have a "deficit"

It is NOT the amounts that I spend on certain things...It IS the difference between income AND spending...Deficit...

- Collapse -
Actually.....
Feb 18, 2017 11:34AM PST

those disabled people who qualify to not have to repay the student loan wind up qualifying for Social Security Disability benefits as well, so why can't they repay the loan from those checks? They weren't working to pay back the loan in the first place so now that they DO have an income, they could, right?

- Collapse -
RE:those disabled people who qualify to not have to repay th
Feb 18, 2017 12:27PM PST
those disabled people who qualify to not have to repay the student loan wind up qualifying for Social Security Disability benefits as well, so why can't they repay the loan from those checks?

AND it would create jobs....processing the lending of money, (for loans)....spending money (processing disability benefits)....spending money (to collect the loans by withdrawing money from the benefits individuals received from another branch of the government to give to another branch of the government )

Lend money from one pocket(student loan),
pay money from another pocket (disability benefits)
collect money from disability benefits and put that back in the first pocket....

People live "high on the hog" in America while drawing gov disability?

RE: They weren't working to pay back the loan in the first place so now that they DO have an income, they could, right?

Do some think a "disabled person" qualified for the student loan to get trained for a position that they had NO hope of ever holding with their disability?

AND they ALSO weren't "disabled"....in "the first place"...OR do some people claim they were disabled when they received their student loan?

ALSO they have to be disabled for 60 months BEFORE they can file for discharge.

You can show that you are totally and permanently disabled in one of the following three ways:

Has lasted for a continuous period of not less than 60 months,


AFTER 60 months, THEN you can apply for forgiveness? ...So they ALREADY take the money out for the 60 months?

Does someone have a link showing that As soon as a person becomes "disabled" they can stop making their student loan payments.

That link would help prove their argument.
- Collapse -
you forget
Feb 18, 2017 12:56PM PST

when student loans are forgiven, they still have to pay taxes on the forgiven amount because it would be considered income.

AND if you actually knew about most disability checks are then you would know they are not much -- barely enough to survive.