cops were searching a ladies purse...they found synthetic urine...lady had it for the same reason as in the story...job interview...
![]() | Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years. Thanks, CNET Support |
Discussion is locked
cops were searching a ladies purse...they found synthetic urine...lady had it for the same reason as in the story...job interview...
When did just doing the job you were hired for correctly and well not become enough?
Does a prospective employer have a right to know about a candidate's criminal history? If "yes", is having been tried and convicted for such crimes the only evidence that should be used in making a decision about the person's suitability for the job? I would add that, IMO, there are some jobs for which this knowledge more important than for other reasons. I would also add that there could be mitigating factors involved depending on any substances that were discovered but it would be up to the employer to make hiring decisions regardless of reason.