Speakeasy forum

General discussion

US policy: Fresh start or more of the same?

by Chorus-Line A1-QMS / June 29, 2004 8:32 PM PDT

By Paul Reynolds
BBC News Online world affairs correspondent
Last Updated: Wednesday, 30 June, 2004

The problems the US has had in occupying Iraq have left the world wondering whether the assertive foreign policy of the Bush administration has reached its limits.

Yet a year on, Iran is still pursuing a policy of developing its own uranium enrichment programme and North Korea has certainly not ended its own nuclear ambitions.

In both cases, the US has pursued diplomacy not war as a means of applying pressure.

Perhaps Libya will be the example to be followed in future.

Libya gave up its weapons development and has been rewarded.

So does the experience of Iraq mean that America got its fingers burned and will be unwilling to put them near the fire again?

Will there be more multilateralism if Mr Bush wins a second term in November?

Or is Washington just keeping its powder dry and does not really care about the fractures in the Western alliance and its unpopularity in the Islamic world?

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: US policy: Fresh start or more of the same?
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: US policy: Fresh start or more of the same?
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
What's in store for Iraq?
by Chorus-Line A1-QMS / June 29, 2004 8:38 PM PDT

Such was the secrecy surrounding the early transfer of authority that a jumpy Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) officials initially asked the assembled journalists not to even report on it until an hour-and-a-half after it was all over.

But once the surprise was over, what had actually changed?

Less than 24 hours after the handover, three US marines were killed in a roadside bomb in Baghdad.

US troops are staying put, but the new prime minister stood before a row of proud Iraqi flags to announce that Saddam Hussein was to appear before an Iraqi judge to be charged for the many atrocities committed under his rule.

Never mind that the Americans helped prepare the podium, that Saddam Hussein will remain under US guard - even if legally he is in Iraqi custody. Mr Allawi announced that the new government had "total sovereignty" over the former dictator.

Symbolism counts in Iraq today, but it won't be enough to satisfy the country's long-suffering people for ever.

Collapse -
Re: What's in store for Iraq?
by John Robie / June 29, 2004 11:22 PM PDT

From what I understand the US is keeping guard over Saddam because the new administration does not have a safe place to keep him.

Secrecy....early transfer. Guess you did read about the early transfer was because of foiling the terrorist doing a 'bang up' celebration on the 30th.
The 30th was not mandatory.

Collapse -
Interesting very interesting indeed!
by Chorus-Line A1-QMS / June 30, 2004 4:51 AM PDT
From what I understand the US is keeping guard over Saddam because the new administration does not have a safe place to keep him. John Robie

Of course, Sadam is US most precious pearl. I would not be suprise to see OBL treated in the same fashion.

Secrecy....early transfer. John Robie

LOL what else is new -- Don't ask, don't tell, Popsy said so. Happy
Popular Forums
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
Laptops 21,181 discussions
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
Phones 17,137 discussions
Security 31,287 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

Does BMW or Volvo do it best?

Pint-size luxury and funky style

Shopping for a new car this weekend? See how the BMW X2 stacks up against the Volvo XC40 in our side-by-side comparison.