Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

US Bombs Fallujah Mosque; More Than 40 Worshippers Killed...

Apr 7, 2004 3:46PM PDT

Associated Press says: "FALLUJAH - U.S. Marines in a fierce battle for this Sunni Muslim stronghold fired rockets that hit a mosque compound filled with worshippers today, and witnesses said as many as 40 people were killed. Shiite-inspired violence spread to nearly all of the country."

Entire article here.

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
Here Charlie
Apr 9, 2004 2:11AM PDT

Take a look at each of these to get an idea of the spin Dave's referring too.

Your original article from Common Dreams by Bassem Mroue and Abdul-Qader Saadi crediting the AP

The actual AP article at the AP's website
You'll notice the original is much smaller showing how much it was padded by Bassem Mroue and Abdul-Qader Saadi of Common Dreams

The same story from CNN with no credit to the AP
You'll notice this article points out the mosque itself was not hit, just one of the walls around the grounds of the mosque. It points out that this was the result of the marines being pinned down by fire from approximately 40 insurgents in the mosque. It also states that earlier reports claimed 40 dead but this report lists no dead at all.

BAGHDAD: (Pakistan) - Despite earlier reports indicating that up to 40 guerillas were killed in Wednesday's air strike on a mosque in Fallujah, a marine officer has admitted that soldiers had failed to find any bodies inside.
Hmmm, no bodies? None at all? No worshippers or fighters?


Your original article was quick to claim that U.S. marines fired rockets at a mosque filled with worshippers and that as many as 40 people were killed. Nowhere does it mention anyone firing from that mosque at the Marines. In the end we find that not only was the mosque not even hit, no one was killed either. FWIW, I stand by my original statement. If they want to use a mosque as a foxhole then we'l treat it like one, as a target!!!

- Collapse -
AP Journalists...
Apr 9, 2004 2:34AM PDT
You'll notice the original is much smaller showing how much it was padded by Bassem Mroue and Abdul-Qader Saadi of Common Dreams - Clay

Bassem Mroue and Abdul-Qader Saadi are AP journalists. They do not work for CommonDreams.org at all. CommonDreams.org posts the articles as they were provided by the News Agencies, in this case the AP...

You found a link from the AP that reported the events slightly different. But since the news agencies are constantly upgrading and modifying their reporting as events lay out, there may and usually are numerous articles by the same news agencies covering the same event, by the same reporters. If you do a search on the Subject using Google, you will see that many sites around the world used the exact same AP article that Charlie linked to at CommonDreams.org and they all correctly attributed the article to the Associated Press...
- Collapse -
(NT) The 'Worshipers Killed' headline is Common Dreams'
Apr 9, 2004 2:39AM PDT

.

- Collapse -
The more posts i read in here the more I become certain that
Apr 9, 2004 3:31AM PDT

the most active individuals in here cannot stick to any subject. Probably they have difficulty following a five item shopping list.

Who cares how reliable the source is. It is the internet a place where anyone can report anything,copywright it,and giggling go on their way.

Clearly we either have to commit genocide in Iraq or get out of there. The English and French Crusaders found that out a 1000 years ago. We are fools if we think anything in that world has changed!

O yes one thing has changed. Oil was found there. If we kill and bury enough of them we may end up enriching the oil fields for future generations to run myriad Suv vehicles for a few months.

However that is my opinion and I am sure that it will not be answered by anyone as there is no website,not even one run by a subteen ager,which cares what I think!

More importantly it would be nice if more of you could think for themselves instead of following one spin line or another!

- Collapse -
Not even a sub teenager
Apr 9, 2004 4:21AM PDT

Thanks for the laugh today. I needed it more than you know and it helps alleviate the acid stomach I get from reading the other garbage spewed by so-called progressives lately.

- Collapse -
Gearup, I wish you would quit saying that. :-(
Apr 9, 2004 5:03AM PDT

"Clearly we either have to commit genocide in Iraq or get out of there."

Obviously we can't do either. It would go against everything America stands for. The fact that we invaded the country in the first place is shameful enough.

We can't leave now, we made too big a mess and we have to clean it up. Or at least make a showing that we have. Unfortunately we have unleashed a terrorism there that wasn't active before and I don't think now it will ever be stopped. Sadly I think you are right and in the long run there will be little changed in Iraq in the future. But then why should it be changed by us? It is the Iraqis' country to run anyway they choose.

- Collapse -
Re:AP Journalists...
Apr 9, 2004 3:28AM PDT
If you do a search on the Subject using Google, you will see that many sites around the world used the exact same AP article that Charlie linked to at CommonDreams.org and they all correctly attributed the article to the Associated Press...

And CommonDreams is the only to claim, "More Than 40 Worshippers Killed". This is clearly a fabrication on their part. The original AP article clearly says, "Cars ferried bodies from the scene, though there was no immediate confirmation of causalities." Just how do you think this turned into "40 Worshippers" when CommonDreams ran their version.

FWIW, I don't particularly understand your desire to defend this obviously inciteful fiction. It is a clear that it is an intentional distortion. Do you really not see this? Do you really want us to believe that you can't see this? We may disagree on many fronts but I prefer to believe that you are smarter than this....

- Collapse -
This is not the problem Clay...
Apr 9, 2004 12:37PM PDT

johnah looked for a reason to complain and looked for a reason to fight. He knows as well as you and I do that the quotations that I made in my initial post were from two people who work for Associated Press:
Bassem Mroue and Abdul-Qader Saadi. They are both employees of the Associated Press and the article that I linked to and quoted were from AP (which johnah in his first post said was a lie!). johnjah didn't even mention the headline in his post where he basically calls me a liar. A liar is somebody who intentionally tells a lie. In my case I don't know if AP used that headline or not and didn't know about it when posting it either. jonja has a history of being antagonistic toward those who don?t agree with him and I happen to be one of them. His hate for me and those who are against the way Israel is handling the problems in the Middle East is beyond anything I have experienced. OTOH he is living in the middle of the war zone and that may explain part of his behavior toward those who disagree with him.

- Collapse -
Re:This is not the problem Clay...
Apr 9, 2004 1:31PM PDT

I think you have the responses mixed up. This software can make the threads pretty confusing.

My response to you was to clarify for you the spin Dave was referring to in his post to me above.

The post to which you responded is a reply to Blake where he tried to claim that the AP had changed the story at some point after CommonDreams used it. Pretty easy to disprove really since this story at SeattlePi posted on 4/7 and this story posted by Aljazeera on 4/7 still match the story posted by the AP on 4/7. The only copy that is different is the one at CommonDreams. IMO, they did a chop job on it and wrote their own headline to say "40 Worshippers Killed". I don't believe that the original AP story said this and then they changed it and everybody else that ran their story changed it too except for CommonDreams which is what it seems Blake would have me believe.

At any rate, I never said you lied. You did post a story that originated with the AP. Unfortunately that copy of the AP story was tainted. My post to you only provided links to the same story over time from a variety of sources you could see and make up your own mind. It was only posted to you to illustrate the spin Dave was referring to in his response to me about Aljazeera not telling the whole story sometimes. Take notice though that the Aljazeera article linked in this post does not claim that worshippers were killed even though it leaves out the part about insurgents firing from the mosque. That is a CommonDreams spin that Dave was claiming would be typical of Aljazeera's reporting since they often try to cast us in a bad light. In actuality it turns out that no one was killed in the incident to which you linked.

- Collapse -
No, you didn't call me a liar...
Apr 9, 2004 2:05PM PDT
?The post to which you responded is a reply to Blake where he tried to claim that the AP had changed the story at some point after CommonDreams used it.? ? Clay

No Clay it isn?t a response to Blake?s post. I simply say that I posted a link to an article that WAS published by AP. If you look at the bottom of the article it says that the copyright is AP?s! Would they be able to say that if AP did NOT publish it at some time? If you think so or if johanh still thinks so, I suggest you drop AP an email asking them if Common Dreams have used AP?s name and tainted the article. I doubt that is the case since many news media are being quoted at Common Dreams. If Common Dreams have published an article that they claim is written by Bassem Mroue and Abdul-Qader Saadi - who are employees at AP ? and the quotation is incorrect, please let me know. It is very possible that the headline isn?t AP?s. But that wasn?t what johnah said in his first reply regarding my post to DK. He said that the article (which means both the headline and the content of the same) was NOT AP?s?

I never said that you called me a liar. But johnah insinuated that I was and thus my previous post. I should probably have posted it as a reply to johnah, but there are certain elements in the forum that I just don?t care to argue with for obvious reasons?
- Collapse -
Re:No, you didn't call me a liar...
Apr 10, 2004 2:18AM PDT
No Clay it isn?t a response to Blake?s post.

I didn't say it was. I said it was a response to my reply to Blake.

I simply say that I posted a link to an article that WAS published by AP. If you look at the bottom of the article it says that the copyright is AP?s! Would they be able to say that if AP did NOT publish it at some time?

No, you posted a link to an article that was purchased from the AP for reprint. Here's the AP article that the CommonDreams story was based on. Scroll to the bottom of the AP story and there's a link where you too can purchase the story for reprint. You can then publish it in your own media publication just like CommonDreams did and you too can make the headline whatever you want it to be. How about "Worshippers Murdered In Senseless Attack"? You can also credit the AP since you bought the story from them.

Would they be able to say that if AP did NOT publish it at some time?

They clearly published the story but not the headline that CommonDreams used for the copy they reprinted. If you don't believe this write the AP and ask them. I never said you didn't link to an article sourced from the AP. The story you linked to clearly originated from the AP like the stories in the others publications here and here. I'm just trying to point out to you that any outlet can purchase and run an AP story. That does not necessarily mean that any given instance is accurate.

But that wasn?t what johnah said in his first reply regarding my post to DK. He said that the article (which means both the headline and the content of the same) was NOT AP?s?

So. That's between you and Jonah. I really don't care. If it makes you feel better the story is an AP story, it's right here on the AP website.

Just remember, just because a story credits the AP doesn't mean it's wholly correct. Many outfits want to put their own spin on things. I frequently find stories at the DrudgeReport or Newsmax that are of interest to the forum but I try to verify them and/or source them elsewhere before I post them here. That's because some people here are so blindly biased that they automatically discard everything linked from those sites as distorted. Going forward you may find the same here with articles from CommonDreams.

- Collapse -
*looking at a very deep hole and wondering*
Apr 9, 2004 8:07PM PDT

how much further you intend digging.....

think of this as a litmus test.....

you posted, and linked too, something from 'common dreams'....

you later claimed it was from 'AP'....

at no stage did i say that the article didn't originate from AP, but i DID say that what YOU posted did NOT originate from AP!

anybody who has clicked the links will know that A: the ORIGINAL AP headline was NOT what you posted and B: you posted the headline from 'common dreams'.....

i think i said before, if you had posted the AP site, most of this thread wouldn't be here....

and now to relate to some of your statements.....

your views on israel and the palestinians has no bearing on how i relate to posts made by you or your friends...

i live in israel, but, contrary to what you believe, it is not a war zone, in fact i just spent a very relaxing 2 days just 15K from gaza, and i didn't see or hear any evidence of a "war zone"....

this --> # A liar is somebody who intentionally tells a lie. In my case I don't know if AP used that headline or not and didn't know about it when posting it either# is no excuse, especially when the mistake was pointed out to you fairly early into this thread....

and finally, the letters of my name can be arranged in 720 different ways, have fun......

- Collapse -
Re:AP Journalists? yes....
Apr 9, 2004 4:39AM PDT

but "common dreams" used their own header.... that was the whole point of my posting...

if charley HAD quoted AP as he stated, most of this thread would never have been posted.....

- Collapse -
"most of this thread would never have been posted....."
Apr 9, 2004 5:08AM PDT

.
But then what would you have done with your spare time? Wink

Hi, Jonah, how are you? I haven't seen too many posts by you lately. You haven't been ill have you?

- Collapse -
Bonus Round
Apr 9, 2004 6:08AM PDT
Third problem is that Al Jazeera doesn't tell the Muslims about the guy with the RPG; they just blare "Americans attack mosque,"...

Know why? From the Koran [2.191],

"....and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you, then slay them; such is the recompense of the unbelievers."

It is against Islam for them to start a fight at the mosque, it must be reported that the we started the fight there or the insurgents would have to answer for violating the Koran...

- Collapse -
They don't build anything decently over there :) NT
Apr 10, 2004 2:36AM PDT

NT