Univision 'journalist' is a joke

Come back when you can show where Ramos is more of a journalist than an activist with an agenda..........

I'm talking about "jokes".

Bannister, a registered Republican who happens to be married to the South Carolina House Majority Leader Rep. Bruce Bannister, said she was in disbelief about what transpired.

If only Obama could get Trump on stage to read Obamas birth certificate.

who is really an activist. They aren't interested in reporting the news, they are so hollow they can only be fulfilled if they make the news about them. Ramos got what he wanted.

You can buy them, no need to yank from someone else.

Why would a person that shaves his head buy a wig?

But if I hear of anyone that wants some...I'll recommend you.

You didn't suggest I had lice?

James asked ME if I wanted a wig. I was talking about me/myself/I shaving MY head...not other people.

IF you were suggesting "other people" might buy a wig because of lice....you should have stated that.

Name calling? Tsk, tsk, tsk.

about 'why would a man who shaves his head want a wig'...IF you were talking about yourself (since I know nothing about what you look like), YOU should have stated that fact. Again.....I gave a reason why one would, and you talk nonsense as usual.

What, no comment about Ramos' ranting and shouting in the video with Bill O' ? Par for the course.

What, no comment about Ramos' ranting and shouting in the video with Bill O' ? Par for the course.

Here's a comment for you

CAUTION...YOU ARE ENTERING THE VULGARITY ZONE......Ranting an shouting on O'Reilly? NO WAY!!!! YES WAY!!!!

IF/WHEN the person that's being interviewed doesn't rant and shout....O'Reilly does...That's why people watch him.

AND

YOU have "no comment" on this yet.

but the subject of the thread. Are you having difficulty following a single thread of thought? That's why we call the line of posts "threads" but you're not even in the fabric of it.

Don't you also point out/complain that certain news "sources" are biased?

It's always the other side that is biased?

or 'interviews' over the years? Like many other 'finally outed journalists', they're really activists for their own causes. If he wanted to be a 'commentator' with an opinion that showed his true beliefs and feelings, he has the ability to do that rather than hide behind a 'journalist' credential badge where he can enter a rally/news op in order to further that agenda with attack questions/statements/accusations. I've yet to see him actually interview or question anyone in the political field with legitimate 'hard question' type positions that weren't either soft (expecting the liberal being questioned/interviewed to answer/respond in Ramos' same position) or hard (hoping the conservative would trip up just enough with a trick question that sets the stage for further attacks/accusations). That's an activist........

And far-left liberals and activists nearly always avoid having to answer anything hard thrown at them because they deflect to another person or incident from years ago as an example of bad/wrong behavior. It's a pattern they have all developed and honed, as you well know because you use it (along with some others here) frequently in your posts.

When you can actually address the topic, come on back.

BUT he only wants ONE question from ONE "reporter" in a Q&A session.

Ask any more than 2 questions in a session...YOU'RE an "activist".

It's hard to get an answer(nail Jello to a wall with one swing of the hammer).

I've seen Trump answer all questions asked of him, even multiples from one reporter..........However, HC got three questions from one Fox reporter the other day, chose the easiest one to answer and told him 'you're only entitled to one question'.

All three questions from the Fox journalist were legitimate questions....no 'gotchas'....she refused to answer the other two because he was only 'entitled' to one, in her opinion, and the other two were 'too hard' for her to handle. It would have meant two more lies, I guess.

Sorry, I have absolutely no idea what you're referring to. cloth?...What's that about?

Logical answer to?

asked by Fox if she had 'wiped' her harddrive/server since the FBI received it blank.............

"wipe" in your other post would have pointed me towards the server reference.

IF I was the reporter MY question to Clinton would have been

Did YOU have the server wiped by someone else? Remove plausible deniability.

I don't think Hillary has the technical expertise to personally wipe her server. Contract out the job.

A LAWYER with years of experience with computers and you don't THINK she has the tech expertise? Excuse me, but even people like ME know how to wipe a drive using specific software...

My biggest concern, to be honest, all along has been that they totally physically destroyed that server drive and replaced with an empty one. THAT'S the easiest way to 'wipe' a drive........

And for her to make that classic sarcastic "I know nothing about how to wipe a drive" (You mean with a cloth?) is so unbelievably similar to "At this point in time, what difference does it make?" and arrogant that is typical HC who still considers herself to be above any laws ever written.

Too bad you're not a reporter.........but I seriously doubt if even YOU would have asked her a question like that because liberals are still covering for her.

HC HASN'T driven a car in 20 years, by her own admission......because she hasn't HAD to. But she's the pillar of empathy for 'independent, strong women' all over the world? Talk about an elitist.........

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/27/clinton-tells-auto-dealers-hasnt-driven-since-16/

probably can't even build a computer from parts or wipe a hard drive on a server.

What CAN she do?

Exactly how does she expect to get elected?

So now we go back to the topic at hand.....reporters/journalists vs activists who pretend to be reporters/journalists.