General discussion

Unanimous Supreme Court Preserves Principle of

Discussion is locked

Reply to: Unanimous Supreme Court Preserves Principle of
PLEASE NOTE: Do not post advertisements, offensive materials, profanity, or personal attacks. Please remember to be considerate of other members. If you are new to the CNET Forums, please read our CNET Forums FAQ. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Reporting: Unanimous Supreme Court Preserves Principle of
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
- Collapse -
I'm not up on this but it reminds me of

the 3/5 of a person argument where slaves who couldn't vote were still part of the equation when it came to determining how many representatives a state could send to H of R. I know that's not a perfect analogy but, IMO, "one person, one vote" only makes sense only in regards to eligible voters but could be expanded to include their dependents. It should never include those here illegally or those here on temporary visas. I'd hope the court's decision doesn't do that.

- Collapse -
Alito's statement leaves the door open

for Republicans to change the argument/wording and bring it back for review.

CNET Forums

Forum Info