the 3/5 of a person argument where slaves who couldn't vote were still part of the equation when it came to determining how many representatives a state could send to H of R. I know that's not a perfect analogy but, IMO, "one person, one vote" only makes sense only in regards to eligible voters but could be expanded to include their dependents. It should never include those here illegally or those here on temporary visas. I'd hope the court's decision doesn't do that.
one person, one vote.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/scotus-evenwel-decision

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic