15 total posts
(NT) Keep on snoozing while the anti-Republican tide swells!
May we assume...............
.......GWB won't get your vote in 2008 ?
(NT) What was Clinton's number at similar time?
Bill Clinton: 37 percent
George H. W. Bush: 29 percent
Ronald Reagan: 35 percent
Jimmy Carter: 28 percent
Gerald Ford: 37 percent
Richard Nixon: 24 percent
Lyndon Johnson: 35 percent
It was actually a rhetorical question for DK
Since he has NO understanding of the concept of history.
Much higher, as the article reports. And no foreign riots
when Clinton travelled, DM -- unlike Bush, he was respected as a great international leader, rather than a shoot-from-the-hip cowboy.
-- Dave K, Speakeasy Moderator
click here to email email@example.com
The opinions expressed above are my own,
and do not necessarily reflect those of CNET!
eyes and ears
Look at the signs and listen to the rhetoric of those protestors. They are anticapitalists, global socialists, and hard Marxists. Many of the leaders of those countries are extremely corrupt. Of course, Clinton was respected by those people. They don't protest one of their own.
Their opinion matters!
One has to wonder to whom when they are seen carrying Che banners
One wonders what he was respected for Dave ...
... more than likely they liked not having to fear him or worry about having their bad side exposed. Saddam didn't take him seriously which is why the prewar intelligence WAS so pi$$ poor.
Oh look, another one here,
(NT) Main stream media only garners 28% itself
Even if those were numbers from last year,
Would've beaten the chump you voted for any how