The CNET Lounge forum

General discussion

Tom - why are DVD formats different from OSes?

by punterjoe / September 12, 2007 10:15 PM PDT

You seem to be all for open source, and all thing GNU & 'nix (which I applaud), but you seem to have totally opposite views on HD-optical formats. One disc to rule them all? It certainly makes things easier. Every title runs on every player. Sounds like Bill Gates' dream.
I'm just trying to understand why the liberating anarchy of open source is good for operating systems & such, but undesirable in disc formats?
I for one welcome China's new Patent-Free Disc format (they should call it the PFDVD). Although I'll bet NTP has a patent tucked away somewhere on optical discs, or the geometric shape "round", or discs with a center hole or something of the sort. Wink

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Tom - why are DVD formats different from OSes?
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Tom - why are DVD formats different from OSes?
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
For one thing,
by minimalist / September 12, 2007 11:08 PM PDT

OS's can be changed. DVD formats can't.

Collapse -
Can't change formats, but can accomodate multis
by punterjoe / September 13, 2007 10:25 PM PDT
In reply to: For one thing,

Once their legal depts gave the OK, the engineers went ahead & made DVD +/- drives that accomodated both formats. There have been tentative moves to do the same with BluRay & HD-DVD. It seems that it all comes down to licensing patent portfolios & not any serious technical issues. I'm not really advocating a format free-for-all, but I find it a bit depressing that everyone is fighting to be THE victor - which will crush their competition & more importantly leave a lot of burned consumers with a useless piece of hardware, since the only way into this game is to pick a side & hope you chose well.
That's why I'm sitting this out. I have enough failed formats & players sitting around my house. IMHO, any money saved to buy a next-gen disc player would be better spent on NAS. A storage array will still be useful when the 'format wars' are over. ...if they ever end.

Collapse -
Patent Free?
by Zombie Bender / September 13, 2007 12:30 AM PDT

China made the new format to get around licensing fees of foriegn formats. I doubt they don't have a patent for it and will charge the same fees to other countries that wanted to uses it.

Collapse -
An OS is a platform.
by navsimpson / September 13, 2007 1:07 AM PDT

So, if you want to run Firefox to surf the web, you can do so regardless of whether you're running OSX, Vista/XP or Linux. You can even run multiple OS's on the same PC. HD discs require you to go out an buy an individual piece of hardware for each piece of software, i.e. Blu-Ray for Disney films, HD-DVD for Universal etc.

Collapse -
One Kernel - Many Distros
by acedtect / September 13, 2007 6:50 AM PDT

I'm for all kinds of deviation form a standard. But as I love IEEE 1394 and 802.11 I also would like to have a standard for HD optical storage. You feel me?

Collapse -
Unix is not Linux
by Nicholas Buenk / September 13, 2007 5:08 PM PDT

Don't forget that Linux isn't the only choice. There's BSD. Or OpenSolaris. Wink

Collapse -
Having a single standard is good
by Nicholas Buenk / September 13, 2007 5:18 PM PDT

It's what Unix is. Unix program can run on any variation of Unix be it GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Darwin or whatever. Unix is a standard that defines the API of the system.
A single standard can be implemented in multiple ways. But having a single standard allows interoperability. Open source picked Unix because it's a clearly defined open standard.... and what you are saying about open source being against a single standard is quite untrue.

Popular Forums
icon
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
icon
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
icon
Laptops 21,181 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
icon
Phones 17,137 discussions
icon
Security 31,287 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
icon
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
icon
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

Does BMW or Volvo do it best?

Pint-size luxury and funky style

Shopping for a new car this weekend? See how the BMW X2 stacks up against the Volvo XC40 in our side-by-side comparison.