Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

Thumbs Up For Mich. Mosques...

Jul 21, 2004 2:06PM PDT

(AP) Residents of this once-predominantly Polish city rejected an effort to repeal an amendment to the city's noise ordinance, a victory for those in favor of allowing mosques to issue the call to prayer over loudspeakers.

The vote on Tuesday, which those in favor of allowing the calls acknowledged was merely symbolic, was 1,462 to 1,200, or 55 percent to 45 percent.

The City Council unanimously passed the noise ordinance in April after a mosque asked for permission to begin broadcasting the Arabic chants, traditionally issued five times a day.

The ordinance regulates the volume and timing of the amplified call. Without the law, city officials said there would be nothing to prohibit the broadcasting of the call to prayer itself.

The council's action provoked an outcry among some longtime residents of Hamtramck, a city of 23,000 people that is surrounded by Detroit. In recent years, the city has seen a rapid influx of immigrants from Bangladesh, Yemen and other countries.

The al-Islah mosque began the call to prayer in May. At least one other Hamtramck mosque has also begun the broadcasts via loudspeakers since then.

"Either way, the call is going to continue to happen," City Council president Karen Majewski said before Tuesday's vote.

The vote was nonetheless widely viewed as a choice between allowing the call to prayer or prohibiting it by repealing the amendment.

More...

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
That's not the problem James, and you know it...
Jul 22, 2004 5:32AM PDT

.
CL explained perfectly the different terms so no one would misunderstand anything. It was said that posts in any language other than English will be considered as baiting because the moderators don't know what it means. In this case CL was perfectly clear in the meaning of the words and so forth there is no reason to discuss that part at all. And you know very well that if other people use words like Chanukkah or Kosher or Shabbat Shalom, that won't be seen as provoking at all...
.

- Collapse -
Personally...
Jul 22, 2004 10:50AM PDT

...I don't care if it's gibberish or a language, but I'm not the one who makes that determination on what's allowed. If I don't understand it, or don't care for it, I just move on past it.

I explained already in another thread that a forum is for communication, which leads to discussion. If gibberish or a language isn't communicating with the others, it fails the purpose of a forum.

- Collapse -
If you are having a hard time understanding...
Jul 22, 2004 5:27AM PDT

why don't you just ask CL? I don't find it any worse than if anybody else would be posting about Catholicism or Judaism or even Southern Baptists, which we had a discussion about some time ago. I assume that freedom of religion provails in this forum too...

- Collapse -
Re: Allaahu Akbar!
Jul 22, 2004 1:04AM PDT

not often that i agree with blake, but isn't this "taunting gibberish"?

- Collapse -
Don't know how appropriate
Jul 22, 2004 1:10AM PDT

it is for Chorus-Line to state it in his subject line, but this is a source for info about it....and I ask that he please refrain from using phrases such as this not in English unless he puts it in his message with a translation along with it.

http://www.bakkah.net/articles/sujoodtilaawah.htm

>>>>As for his (Sayyid Saabiq's [1]) statement:

"On the authority of Ibn 'Umar, he said, 'The Prophet (sallallaahu 'alayhe wa sallam) used read the Qur'aan in front of us (in prayer), and when he came to verse of prostration, he would make takbeer (saying "Allaahu akbar") and prostrate, and we would also prostrate.' It was collected by Aboo Daawood, Al-Bayhaqee, and Al-Haakim who said about it, 'It is saheeh according to the conditions of the two shaykhs (Al-Bukhaaree and Muslim).'">>>>

TONI

- Collapse -
Re: Don't know how appropriate
Jul 22, 2004 2:00AM PDT

Good site by the way Happy And yes to the hadith you quoted. It is absolutely Saheeh. Happy Did you understand what it means though or you just saw the word to show me I have to consult you for my Arabic base upon one quote?

Takbeer the saying of "Allaahu Akbar".

Well, interesting a None Muslim would again teach me my RELIGION. Happy Sounds like you are directing me to see a chiropractor to get my muffler fix.
:
:
:
Here's is the adhan, and here is meaning and the lyrics to the ADHAN.
:
:
:
:
What does it sounds like?
:
:
:
:
Educate yourself Happy

- Collapse -
Not trying to teach you your religion....
Jul 22, 2004 2:15AM PDT

asking nicely that you not teach it to us unless you've been asked to.

I posted the link for others as a consideration.

TONI

- Collapse -
Re: Not trying to teach you your religion....
Jul 22, 2004 2:42AM PDT

Let me draw your attention to the article and read the contents given that such has relations to what I posted.
:
Second, did it violate any TOS RULES?
:
If I had posted this as a different article would it be A VIOLATION as far as Knowledge base?
:
If I wrote about CHRISTIANITY IN THE light of Christianity would it make any difference to your cautioning me? WOULD you have said the same to a Christian?
:
And other religious information to share other should I find something interesting worth learning?
:
Lastly, you would have not posted an Islamic Link to justify your intent without a Muslim giving further clarification to what you are quoting given that the information you gave is TOO VAGUE for others to understand.

AND YOUR quote:
asking nicely that you not teach it to us unless you've been asked to.
I posted the link for others as a consideration.
TONI

I want to borrow Clay's quote ---------- Is this a new rule OR your rule BECAUSE you dislike this particular person and this religion?
:
:
:
:
It's obvious eh.
:
:
:
There are tons of Muslims and Islamic issue posted here that are wrongfully attributed to the religion and Muslims, yet expect a Muslim such as myself to remain quiet?
:
:
:
and let others continuously dwell on wrong info? In other words, IGNORANCE is the results of censorship? Happy

- Collapse -
Re: Not trying to teach you your religion....
Jul 22, 2004 2:53AM PDT

they pulled clays post are you any better??
i think not

- Collapse -
TERMINOLOGIES .......
Jul 22, 2004 3:03AM PDT

without translation -----is considered derogatory.
:
:
:
:
:
I provided mine. Not taking my words?
:
:
:
I again provided my proofs from various Islamic links?
:
:
:
Not satisfied?
:
:
:
:
Well, let's all take a LONG NAP. Happy

- Collapse -
nope im not ...
Jul 22, 2004 6:21AM PDT

the post wasnt in english therfore it should be pulled as clays was seems like 2 sided pulling

- Collapse -
I ask you CL...
Jul 22, 2004 5:35AM PDT

to keep informing us about Islam. I think it is important to learn how it is seen from inside the religion and not only from the outside which is the side that is usually presented! Wink

- Collapse -
Re: I ask you CL...
Jul 22, 2004 6:07AM PDT

Thanks CT. It's very encouraging to note that there are few people who are by far open-minded than some others.

Well, it is not always easy to talk about Islam and often I have refrained from responding to other member's postings.
:
:
:
:
Let's just say, I am somewhat selective which posters or postings deserves a response and postings that inevitably requires one.
:
:
:
If you ask, I will have an answer available. Happy

- Collapse -
New Rule???
Jul 22, 2004 2:51AM PDT
asking nicely that you not teach it to us unless you've been asked to. - TONI H

Is this a new rule Toni? Unless you're also prepared to tell our most Christian members to stop posting scripture from the Bible, you don't have any right to tell our Muslim members to refrain from sharing their religion either...

No one asks for most of what is posted here in SE. Everything is offered freely. If members don't want to read text from the Christian or Muslim members, they can easily ignore those posts...
- Collapse -
Re: New Rule???
Jul 22, 2004 2:54AM PDT

as long as its in english
ask clay forien language is giberish to me and i dont want to have to get a translator.
so this is an english forum
if chorus line wants a non english forum or you or charlie feel free to start one

- Collapse -
Being Afraid To Learn New Things...
Jul 22, 2004 3:12AM PDT
so this is an english forum - Mark G

This is a forum of mostly English speakers. But there is no rule in the CNET TOS that requires English to be used. If you are demanding that only English be used, you are also affecting the posts of almost every other member...

A large percentage of the words in our language are adopted from foreign language sources. How did they get there you ask? They were used during a period of the evolution of our language and eventually some of them were adopted as part of our understanding and language. Since English is always evolving and absorbing foreign words, you cannot simply demand that people stop using foreign words or our language will stagnate, which is generally viewed as a bad thing in many circles...

Instead of being afraid to learn new things, you should embrace the opportunity whenever possible. Knowledge and understanding is really not a bad thing...


.
- Collapse -
Re: Being Afraid To Learn New Things...
Jul 22, 2004 5:22AM PDT

"Knowledge and understanding is really not a bad thing..."

No it is not a bad thing, so long as the person transmitting it has the intelligence to properly display it as English in a English speaking Forum.

George

- Collapse -
Our Highest Priorities...
Jul 22, 2004 5:47AM PDT
No it is not a bad thing, so long as the person transmitting it has the intelligence to properly display it as English in a English speaking Forum. - G. Rolway

Speaking multiple languages is a great skill that a great many around the world possess. Sadly, we here in the US tend to isolate ourselves by not bothering to learn other languages and it prevents us from better understanding other cultures and values. It would be a mistake to demand that all adhere to another inflexible new rule..

Our language will continue to evolve and it will continue to absorb foreign words no matter how hard some will try to prevent it. Instead of closing our doors and building barriers to new knowledge as it presents itself, we should embrace the knowledge and allow all who would share it to enter. As foreign speakers present new and interesting words into our discussions, our knowledge and understanding will surely expand and grow. Knowledge is a good thing and expanding it should be one of our highest priorities...


.
- Collapse -
Re: Being Afraid To Learn New Things...
Jul 22, 2004 6:24AM PDT

and when they pulled oths posts for non english they made it that way so as its discrimitory not to pull others why allow it?

- Collapse -
Were Translations Provided???
Jul 22, 2004 6:46AM PDT
and when they pulled oths posts for non english they made it that way so as its discrimitory not to pull others why allow it? - Mark G

There's a big difference. When CL posts, (s)he usually provides a definition to the foreign words used. When ROT13 was used, there was no translation provided. If the ROT13 messages were innocent, then an English translation should have been no big deal...


.
- Collapse -
Re: Were Translations Provided???
Jul 22, 2004 7:00AM PDT

lee made the desion

- Collapse -
Yep, Translations Are Now Required...
Jul 22, 2004 7:14AM PDT
lee made the desion - Mark G

It seems that you misunderstood what Lee said. He didn't make a new rule that requires English only. Lee's new rule clearly states that translations are required whenever the message cannot be understood in plain English...


.
- Collapse -
Re: do christians post in Latin?
Jul 22, 2004 3:05AM PDT

they moment they do, i guess they'll be told to stop...

- Collapse -
(NT) (NT) depends on the poster you know double sided
Jul 22, 2004 6:25AM PDT
- Collapse -
For the record
Jul 22, 2004 3:55AM PDT

I don't agree with that part of Toni's statement as delivered, but in context maybe she meant something different by it in relation to posting in a foreign language or using foreign terms unfamiliar to others.

- Collapse -
Re: For the record
Jul 22, 2004 4:23AM PDT

You've got that right, James.

CL gave translations of the -to us-unknown words.

The objections come when translations have not been given. Or when terms are used that are not familiar to everyone.

As a public forum, the texts are to be readable to everyone.

When translations are given, we take them at face value until shown otherwise.

Angeline
click here to email semods4@yahoo.com

- Collapse -
Re: Thumbs Up For Mich. Mosques.../strangely no mention
Jul 22, 2004 3:13AM PDT

Many christian churches have and still employ bells as calls to worship or calls to the attention of significant moments such as weddings, etc. I am not sure if this is regulated anywhere. I have yet to be annoyed by such a bell. I would probably change my mind if two churches in my neighborhood of different denominations declared a bell "war"....each adding decibels to out "loud" the other.

- Collapse -
I was thinking of that too.
Jul 22, 2004 3:42AM PDT

I was comparing the melodious sounds of church bells in small towns across America, to the newer image of some ugly old guy wearing a shroud wrapped around his head, screaming from the top of a tower or minaret across the neighborhood or town. Guess which image is more appealing.

I also think "frequency" is a key factor here. Five times a day the old geezer yells out loudly across the neighborhood, or one day a week a church rings it's bells for morning worship.

I once lived in a small town where everyday at noon they used the old raid/fire/emergency/tornado warning siren to announce noontime. I can't remember now if it also went off on Sundays too, but it sure did every other day. We lived 2 blocks from it. Loud enough you had to quit talking for about 3-5 minutes.

Noise in neighborhoods can be a valid problem to address. I think having someone screaming on a regular basis every day from the top of a tower, aided by Allah's own megaphone (I'm assuming Mohammed authorized it's use) is probably a bigger distraction than a noontime siren, or a Sunday bell ringing.

- Collapse -
Christian Bells may not have words....
Jul 22, 2004 3:48AM PDT

...but it is spiritually soothing....
.....a reminder from the People of The Book and The Scriptures that they too are calling everyone to remain steadfast in their worship of their faith.

- Collapse -
In addition, back to the subject....
Jul 22, 2004 4:46AM PDT
The ordinance regulates the volume and timing of the amplified call. Without the law, city officials said there would be nothing to prohibit the broadcasting of the call to prayer itself.
====================================================

How open-minded it is the State of Detroit, MI.

I must say that it will be very difficult for the others to put up with the Adhan (the call to prayer) just as the others would find it difficult to put up with the Christian Bells, and it may also be true for those who have to put up with BOTH these sounds, sounding all at the same time. Who would ever thought of "consideration" when everyone has their own preferences?
:
:
However, for someone who enjoys SOUNDS, it is all Music to my ears. The sound of rattling tin cans, pots and pans dropping, even the sound of the siren... you name it ---- it is an Art for my ears. In the same token, negative vocal tones are amusing and positive vocal tones are healthy encouragement for the mind and personal empowerment to build self-esteem for the listeners.
:
:
:
:
It appears that negative vocal tones are easier to create and quite contagious. <chuckles> Devil Sprinkle me with some Holy H2O quick.