![]() | Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years. Thanks, CNET Support |
as to be consistent, to support or attack only one position ..." then alarm bells should be ringing all the way to Washington. Unfortunately Washington is owned by the guys who in all probability stole the votes in the first place.
rob
Unfortunately Washington is owned by the guys who in all probability stole the votes in the first place.
you keep on telling this same old bs
and yet when i say something about kerry im told its enough of it.
well this lies enough, your total bias is enough.
2. the bias of the author and 3. factual inaccuracy. You have done none of the above. You have, however, declared your own bias and your refusal to even consider the evidence provided. Your assertion is without merit on its face, you don't even get to take it to court for a judgement.
Rob Boyter
Given the overt underhanded, sneakiness that is inherent in the DNC, why wouldn?t they have had at least one of their own infiltrate the ?Vast Right Wing Conspiracy? that was involved in ?stealing? yet a second national election. The Democrats were crying about the VRWC stealing the election months before the election. Why didn?t they then prepare to produce evidence of systematic election fraud? Why not? IT DIDN?T HAPPEN!
many irregularities should be most thoroughly investigated. That has not happened to date, and may not be possible in some instances. The handling of the voting machines and the lack of any true audit saw to that.
Only the most closed minded individual would not find some of the occurrences listed in this article to be suspicious.
Dan
What you are suggesting is that there is a large conspiracy with many sub conspiracies within it. It is simple to commit election fraud at a local level but without making large changes in normal voting procedures, it can?t be done state wide to swing a State as large as Florida or Ohio.
and what I said, is I think that the many irregularities should be most thoroughly investigated. That has not happened to date, and may not be possible in some instances. The handling of the voting machines and the lack of any true audit see to that.
Only the most closed minded individual would not find some of the occurrences listed in this article to be suspicious.
Dan
What you need to need to do is sign up to work as an election judge. (I have worked it). You will find out how many ? irregularities? occur that are normal events or what absolutely ignorant people think are ?irregularities?.
Such irregularities hardly address the bulk of what was considered in the article. That is most obvious.
Dan
Face it Gore lost and Kerry lost! Maybe because they had nothing for the People?
I think he is wrong sometimes and right others. He's not insisting the election was rigged, and I doubt it was. I doubt a congressional investigation would uncover anything or have any real value; just a continuation of the arguing.
Move on. Do better next time if you can.
Good quote, "I did not think that John Kerry should have been president of any country at any time."
vote in Florida and found no evidence that the election was 'stolen' or that Gore would have won in a further recount.
really enjoy. Lots of statistics and a carefully reasoned and not overly partisan conclusion.
Ignore the Buddhist chorus here at SE. They are merely the sound of one hand (the right, of course) clapping.
Rob Boyter