21 total posts
It seems that Rev. Wright doesn't see any desire on the part
of whites to assist other races. I guess that is why whites have sent medical missionaries to people who needed them for hundreds of years. I'm sure blacks have never indulged in sins like cruise ships.
Those same missionares
who forced indigenous peoples to convert to Christianity and 'civilized' them by turning them into servants and cotton pickers. I won't mention slaves.
Ohhh, don't get me wrong, I am fully aware that it was the British and other European nations who did the so called civilizing in the 18th and 19th centuries when we all had our own little empires.
But I find it strange that those of you who argue against mine and others involvement in this forum on matters of US politics and other things, on the grounds that we are still trying to impose our imperialistic past on you, don't see the contradictions in what you say. We've moved on. It seems you cannot.
And by the way, those missionaries for the first couple hundred years were not medical. They didn't treat the sick and the disabled. They preached eternal damnation if the local population didn't convert. And those that resisted? They were punished for their sins by the British and other colonial armies.
I see precious little of "whites" helping other races in history. Sadly, I see precious little of people such as yourselves helping other races now.
And did they cannabalize those people? Hang shrunken heads?
Yeah, they didn't do a darn thing there for good, did they?
Not all of them
Many of them were quite civilized in their own way. You should read about some of the things white people did to such peoples. That would make your toes curl.
Is this really your view of Africans James? You seem to have something against them, wherever they now live.
what are you talking about?!
I don't have anything against them, and what "them" are you speaking of? Missionaries or native Africans? As I recall YOU are the one who expressed concern about it.
or sacrifice babies
to their God's. Yeah Missionaries have done no good at all! As I recall Ruth Grahams Father was a missionary doctor for years in Afica
Look for gutenberg press online.
Read about Dr. Livingston, learn something, then get back to us with actual knowledge instead of silly sound bytes.
Ohh, I know a little about Livingston
He was one of the first missionaries to even attempt to change the slave trade into something less nasty, but found it difficult to gather support until well past the middle of the century. Incidentally, Stanley who famously found Livingston, was very brutal to his expedition porters.
You miss my point, (f course). My first reply was about the mistaken observation that whites were pure and good in Africa and elsewhere. The fact is, they were anything but.
Nobody said everything was wonderful
Some of them weren't, but when you look at what they faced in trying to deal with what equated to little more than cruel savages who were constantly killing others and eating their flesh, keeping various body parts of enemies as totems, it's more understandable.
So, two cannibals are eating a clown...
and one says to the other, "Does this taste funny to you?"
I've not heard any cannibal jokes in a while. I must yahoo and see if a site carries them.
yep, plenty of them.
There you go again
Sure, some were cannibals. Most were not. And savage is a white term that we employed all too often when we came across people who didn't conform to our religion and religious ethics.
If you had read more about Livingston as you beseeched me to do, you would have known that Livingston had no trouble with the African peoples because he didn't try to ram religion down their throats, and didn't try to change them into people they were not. He worked with them using their own ways and rules, and gained their trust and respect that way.
I have and he despised
..slavery and the Mohamedans who were the biggest traffickers in slaves and showed little regard for the lives of Africans. He also hated the way they treated the women and how they dealt with murderers depending on the perceived value of the one murdered. There were other things, but someone who's interested can just study on it.
If we're talking history...
If we're talking history, let's not forget the Dutch ship the White Lion. It was the first recorded instance of slavery in America. The White Lion landed in Virginia needing repairs and supplies, and traded 20 African slaves for food and help with repairs.
You said, "But I find it strange that those of you who argue against mine and others involvement in this forum on matters of US politics and other things, on the grounds that we are still trying to impose our imperialistic past on you, don't see the contradictions in what you say. We've moved on. It seems you cannot."
Don't confuse arguing against some of your views with arguing against your being here. Your saying "We've moved on. It seems you cannot." is, in my opinion, throwing the race card. Disagreement with something you say does not mean that that person has not "moved on" with relation to the subject of race. Saying it to someone implies that that person was a racist in the first place.
RE: Don't confuse arguing against some of your views
Don't confuse arguing against some of your views with arguing against your being here.
I certainly don't get them confused.
You have to admit,
you seem to be confused about a lot of things.
I haven't ever heard of a single missionary who forced
anyone to become a Christian. I have heard of missionaries telling people about Jesus, and how he came to give us eternal life. Sharing such universal truths are a good thing. Such truth frees people from the fear and spiritual slavery that many people live in.
Other missionaries do such bad things as providing medical treatment, developing written languages, teaching people improved farming techniques, and a whole raft of other activities.
The missionaries could have stayed home and lived comfortable lives. Many could have obtained wealth. Instead, they sacrificed their lives to save the lives of other people. It sounds like you would have preferred that they stay home, and let many people die. That's sad.
I see my mistake now. Gee, I thought Rev. Wright
was probably talking about Americans. That's what I was talking about. Americans. I don't know, or particularly care, how the English tried to use the church to advance its empire. That's one reason the government in the United States is not allowed to involve itself in the church.
Oh, those whites helping other races? I think it was Gladstone in England who fought to end slavery there. I guess ending slavery is "precious little". In the United States, it took 100s of thousands, if not millions, of whites to oppose and finally end slavery. My own great-great-grandfather suffered a dibilitating illness for the rest of his life because he helped with that effort. I guess that is also "precious little".