Speakeasy forum

General discussion


North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Il now says he's sorry about his nation's first nuclear test. Why the sudden change of heart? Because North Korea's biggest neighbor, China, has turned up the heat. Essentially China sent a delegation to meet with The Gargoyle and told him to come back to the six-party talks and stop testing nuclear weapons. The result was Kim Jong-Il caved. China is his enabler. He had no real choice. So we probably won't see anymore nuclear tests north of the DMZ for awhile.

All of this proves one thing......the Bush administration's way of dealing with North Korea actually works, whereas the Clinton administration's policy of appeasement and bilateral negotiations does not. If Clinton had been in office --- or if the Democrat Appeasement Party had its way, we would have rushed in there with money and promises, and the Gargoyle would be sitting fat and happy, the toast of America-haters everywhere.

All The Gargoyle did with his agreement with the Clinton White House was violate it immediately. It wasn't worth the paper it was printed on. Requiring Kim Jong-Il to negotiate with his neighbors in the six-party talks is proving much more effective. What's The Gargoyle going to say to China? No? I don't think so...especially since China could squash North Korea like a bug.

Of course, the mainstream media won't report the story this way. They'll project Kim Jong-Il in a positive light for his reversal, and never mention that it is the result of the Bush policy and Bush administration diplomatic efforts with China, South Korea and Japan. And they won't go solicit comment from people like The Poodle, who think we should be negotiating with North Korea directly


Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: THE NORKS' MEA CULPA
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: THE NORKS' MEA CULPA
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
Bush administration's way of dealing with N K actual works


I agree

Get other nations together, impose sanctions AND enforce them

Perhaps the world did learn something from the liberation of Iraq.

Collapse -
the real BIG difference is CHINA

In reply to: Bush administration's way of dealing with N K actual works

if you had china as your neighbor and china said jump you say how high

and when President Bush refused 1 on 1 was good as it showed strength, not letting nk to say see we got our way with the usa

Collapse -
we got our way with the usa

In reply to: the real BIG difference is CHINA

And then you give a big bouquet to China

You're killin' me mark.

(NT) Which is it China or Bush?

OR both?

or all countries?

Sanctions don't work unless all countries are involved.

Didn't you learn anything from Iraq?

Collapse -
yes some countries use appeasement

In reply to: we got our way with the usa

you still want to spout off?
i mean look at your own countrys short falls

come on jp as your country hasnt done anything about iraq.

and as the nk leader wanted 1 on 1 with the usa and we refused get off your merry go round and read

Collapse -
didn't take you

In reply to: yes some countries use appeasement

long to bring up appeasement, next it'll be kerry, clinton

See ya later, perhaps on another subject, but they all come back to the same point.

Collapse -
The Gargoyle


TOS violation?

Collapse -
why would it be a tos?

In reply to: The Gargoyle

i could say sub human and thats no tos

Collapse -
(NT) (NT) Because "LOOKISM" is not PC.

In reply to: why would it be a tos?

Collapse -
If you want to be picky

In reply to: The Gargoyle

how about "The NORKS'"????

Popular Forums

Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
Laptops 21,181 discussions
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
Phones 17,137 discussions
Security 31,287 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
Windows 10 2,657 discussions


Enter to win* a free holiday tech gift!

CNET's giving five lucky winners the gift of their choice valued up to $250!