Speakeasy forum

General discussion

The Lingerie Bowl

by Mary Kay / December 4, 2003 7:11 AM PST
Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: The Lingerie Bowl
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: The Lingerie Bowl
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
I loved some of the one liners ...
by Bill Osler / December 4, 2003 8:08 AM PST
In reply to: The Lingerie Bowl

Will the game's organizers test for implants? If so, can I help?

Should we refer to this as Lingerie Bowl I, Lingerie Bowl 2004 or Lingerie Bowl 38C?

New Orleans ought to have a great Lingerie team -- half their players are men.

Wow, look at the ... uh, arm ... on that quarterback.

Collapse -
nt) That was a hoot, MK. :-)
by IanC_OZ / December 4, 2003 8:45 AM PST
In reply to: The Lingerie Bowl

.

Collapse -
The Lingerie Bowl
by roneidaselva / April 1, 2012 3:02 PM PDT
In reply to: The Lingerie Bowl

Try the link but not working at all. Look at this pls.

Collapse -
It's from 2004
by Steven Haninger / April 1, 2012 8:06 PM PDT
In reply to: The Lingerie Bowl

but you're excused as a first time poster. Any lingerie from 2004 is probably considered to be too modest for the modern games and wouldn't attract enough voyeurs to satisfy sponsors and promoters today. Wink

Collapse -
I believe lingerie today
by James Denison / April 1, 2012 8:28 PM PDT
In reply to: It's from 2004

....is more commonly referred to today as "String Theory". Wink

Collapse -
(NT) LOL
by MarkFlax Forum moderator / April 1, 2012 8:29 PM PDT
Popular Forums
icon
Computer Help 51,912 discussions
icon
Computer Newbies 10,498 discussions
icon
Laptops 20,411 discussions
icon
Security 30,882 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 21,253 discussions
icon
Windows 10 1,672 discussions
icon
Phones 16,494 discussions
icon
Windows 7 7,855 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 15,504 discussions

CNET ON CARS

Want to see the future of car technology?

Brian Cooley found it for you at CES 2017 in Las Vegas and the North American International Auto Show in Detroit.