The Kingdom of Kush (mentioned in the Bible)

I like history and the bible, and this story has both.

Some of that information isn't that new, though:
Though Cushites were to be found in Arabia, the name Cush as used in the Bible in most cases clearly refers to a region in Africa, and where the relationship is obvious, translators simply render "Cush" as "Ethiopia." It is regularly associated with Egypt (Isa 20:3-5; 43:3; Jer 46:7-9) and also with Libya. (2Ch 12:2, 3; Da 11:43; Na 3:9) Isaiah 11:11 presents the ancient geographic designations for the regional divisions running southward from the Nile Delta: "Egypt" (or "Mizraim," here, Lower Egypt), "Pathros" (Upper Egypt), and "Cush" (Nubia-Ethiopia). Ezekiel 29:10 speaks of the devastation of Egypt "from Migdol to Syene and to the boundary of Ethiopia [Cush]." Thus, Cush or ancient Ethiopia appears to have been beyond Syene (modern Aswan) and, according to archaeological evidence, continued S perhaps as far as modern Khartoum. Cush thus embraced a more extensive and generally more southern area than that included in present-day Ethiopia. "The rivers of Ethiopia [Cush]" are suggested to have been the Blue and White Nile rivers, which have their junction at Khartoum, and also the Atbara River, which joins the Nile S of the fifth cataract.-Zep 3:10.

Excerpt from "Cush 2.", Insight on the Scriptures, 1988, a Watchtower publication. The full article shows quite an overlap of your link and what was known as far back as 1959 (a cite in the Insight article). The big difference is that the secular information has the usual apology about 'we had no idea that [blank] was so important then". Our view: ... Ivory, ebony, gold, precious stones, iron, and aromatics were products of the land, and Biblical mention is made of "the merchants of Ethiopia" (Isa 45:14) and "the topaz of Cush."-Job 28:19.
Later History. Cush, or Ethiopia, had come under Egyptian domination by about the time of the Exodus of Israel from Egypt, and it continued thus for some 500 years. A viceroy administering this domain under the Egyptian Pharaoh was known by the title "King's Son of Kush ...

The article in Insight's predecessor, Aid to Bible Understanding. 1969; 1971, is virtually the same.

BTW, the first mention of Cush is at Gen 2:13. Just after that is the true First [and only] Commandment: 'Don't touch that tree!' Later, Adam and Eve said 'Our view of that command is that it's out-of-date; we have later information.' Rest is history. (Later they were banned from SE - sorry, from the Garden - for their independent thinking. Nowadays, of course, we're used to charting our own course independent of outmoded books, with the results you see around you.)

...that the more the scientists explore, the more the Bible is found to be true (Draw your own conclusions...).