aren't criminal ones, unlike HC's lies.............
Discussion is locked
Private email accounts (BC's ambassador and HC) holding classified documents.
Classified documents destroyed even after Congress issued the subpoena requesting those emails.
Petreus having said classified document (ONE, not thousands) in his home and sharing that document with someone else......HC same issues by sharing with persons who may/may not have the same security clearances to see them (such as her attorney who helped 'sort' what was kept and what was destroyed).
HC....PRINTING the emails to give to State Dept rather than sending digital copies which would have included the header information.
The list is even longer, but her statements of "no classified information was ever sent or received" is a lie since it's the ONLY email account she used for Secretary of State, has been proven to be a lie already and that's without having ALL of the emails read yet, and it's beyond belief that she had the account for the entire four years of her 'service' and never had even ONE classified emails sent or received.
But liberals will continue to defend the only candidate they can come up with.....right up until she is indicted. Buying time until she wins the nomination, names a running mate they can live with as her successor, and then toss her to the wolves via the liberal "Justice Dept", where the VP will probably give her a Presidential Pardon immediately after being sworn in like Ford did with that POS Nixon...........
Petreus was INDICTED with a criminal act....SHE hasn't been YET, so your assumption that it's NOT a criminal act until a trial and conviction is wrong.
IF government documents are on a GOVERNMENT email account and a GOVERNMENT server, the State Dept. gets ALL of the emails and ALL of the info contained in them, including the HEADER info. PRINTING from her house doesn't give the State Dept. ALL of the info about those emails.
How could an attorney help sort emails as to what gets printed and sent to the State Dept and what gets 'deleted' and NOT be allowed to READ them? AND, in the world according to HC (pun intended regarding the "World According to Garp"), she never had received or sent classified documents..........in FOUR years....so how could SHE determine what her attorney would be allowed to read since she claims there weren't ANY? Even the FBI investigation has uncovered 1000 already out of the 30,000 that were sent to the State Dept. that WERE classified, including at least TWO that were TOP SECRET......and there are still thousands to go through yet.
Try harder, JP.....you're slipping badly.
YES...on YOUR part.
so your assumption that it's NOT a criminal act until a trial and conviction is wrong.
Hillary is NOT GUILTY of a criminal act until she has a trial and is FOUND GUILTY of a criminal act. What she did is not a criminal act, committed by her, until she has a trial and is found guilty.
Innocent until proven guilty?
How could an attorney help sort emails as to what gets printed and sent to the State Dept and what gets 'deleted' and NOT be allowed to READ them?
Hillary selects emails she thinks MIGHT be classified and lets the attorney read "them...and only them"None of which were "classified" or have been determined to be "classified"...NOT ALL of the email on her server.
It would be like me inviting you to read the email in my junk mail file.
BUT was relieved of duty BEFORE an indictment was issued.....so he was found GUILTY by others early on, and at first ONLY because of the affair.....without a trial or conviction even though adultery is not allowed by military standards (being gay is ok, but you can't cheat on your spouse as if gays don't break their relationship 'vows/promises')
So, on YOUR part, HC gets another free pass? Will you feel differently once an indictment is issued even if the trial and conviction hasn't happened yet? Perhaps one day, you'll actually see that actual forest through the fake trees that HC keeps putting up in front of it, but I doubt it.
was convicted/indicted under exactly the same circumstances....classified AFTER he had received/sent them....the law makes NO distinction about that because it's automatically a given that anybody with classified security clearance KNOWS what is and isn't. AND if she had had a government email address and used the State Dept.'s server, they would have been classified immediately.
ALL of her 1000 found already were classified as 'sensitive', 'classified', or 'top secret' AFTER the judge ORDERED her to turn them over since she 'destroyed' them AFTER Congress had subpoenaed them. And that only covers the PRINTED ones she sent......wait till the FBI gets to the ones she deliberately deleted.
You cannot possibly believe that every single email in four years as Secretary of State was NOT classified.....oh, wait....you're a liberal, so of course you can.
Hillary's Grand Entrance. No trumpets sounding?
"He considers it ‘too disgusting’ to talk about BUT, HE wants to talk about it? Try and justify/defend him even bringing the subject up."
11 - And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them. For it is a shame even to speak of those things which are done of them in secret. But all things that are reproved are made manifest by the light: for whatsoever doth make manifest is light.
11 - Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them. It is shameful even to mention what the disobedient do in secret, but everything exposed by the light becomes visible—and everything that is illuminated becomes a light. (known)