Speakeasy forum

General discussion

The Bush Attack on 200 years of American democracy.

by Ziks511 / May 2, 2005 6:01 PM PDT

and the independence of the judiciary from the Executive Branch.

When James Madison introduced the Bill of Rights, he explained that "independent tribunals of justice will consider themselves... the guardians of [these] rights, ... an impenetrable bulwark against every assumption of power in the legislature or executive."

So, it is not as a Democrat but as an American, that I appeal today to the leadership of the majority in the Senate to halt their efforts to break the Senate's rules and instead protect a meaningful role in the confirmation of judges and justices for Senators of both parties. Remember that you will not always be in the majority, but much more importantly, remember what is best for our country regardless of which party is temporarily in power. Many of us know what it feels like to be disappointed with decisions made by the courts. But instead of attacking the judges with whose opinions we disagree, we live by the rule of law and maintain respect for the courts.

I am genuinely dismayed and deeply concerned by the recent actions of some Republican leaders to undermine the rule of law by demanding the Senate be stripped of its right to unlimited debate where the confirmation of judges is concerned, and even to engage in outright threats and intimidation against federal judges with whom they philosophically disagree.


Unsurprisingly, I agree.


Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: The Bush Attack on 200 years of American democracy.
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: The Bush Attack on 200 years of American democracy.
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
If the Democrats want to fillibuster ...
by Evie / May 2, 2005 9:23 PM PDT

... a BETTER solution is for the Republicans to roll in the cots and really call them on it. Let Teddy & Co. stand up and "debate" endlessly on why Judge Janice Rogers Brown shouldn't be confirmed. By limiting "debate" to 100 hours, the Republicans are doing the Democrats the favor of not allowing them to air their true objections to these judges -- that they are either (1) a conservative minority, (2) conservative woman, (3) even a hint of pro-life, or (4) some mix thereof. How dare they be INDEPENDENT of the monolithic group think so-called "liberals" insist they subscribe to!

Collapse -
That's a joke
by EdH / May 2, 2005 9:58 PM PDT

How is trying to enable people to vote an attack on Democracy? The attack on Democracy is the fillibuster.

Oh, I understand. You only like Democracy when the vote goes YOUR way.

Collapse -
There is no right to filibuster
by dirtyrich / May 2, 2005 10:22 PM PDT

Nor is the Senate entitled to confirm Bush's appointments... they are directed to advise the President, not provide a check against his power int his case.
Trying to push this whole filibuster thing as a primary concept of our Democracy is foolish and shows how little you know about our history, our Constitution, and government.

Collapse -
Some do not yet
by Dan McC / May 3, 2005 12:10 AM PDT

understand the advanced concept that a democratic state is not a tyrannical state.

Maybe they'll get it someday.


Popular Forums
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
Laptops 21,181 discussions
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
Phones 17,137 discussions
Security 31,287 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
Windows 10 2,657 discussions


Help, my PC with Windows 10 won't shut down properly

Since upgrading to Windows 10 my computer won't shut down properly. I use the menu button shutdown and the screen goes blank, but the system does not fully shut down. The only way to get it to shut down is to hold the physical power button down till it shuts down. Any suggestions?