Truth in reporting.
1,400 Possible Ebola Cases in US Today
![]() | Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years. Thanks, CNET Support |
Discussion is locked
Truth in reporting.
1,400 Possible Ebola Cases in US Today
considering the fact that we never had ANY until BO decided, like illegals, to bring it here by personal invite.
perhaps for you...1400 POSSIBLE cases isn't enough for some...they have to embellish the story.
was the question asked.....the response didn't 'embellish' or state 'active but only possible'.....the response was "1400".
"Some" people just have to pick at a sore, too......just so they can have a 'mark' left behind.
We wouldn't HAVE 1400 'possible' cases if it wasn't for him, in the first place, would we?
As for the 'headline' in the story, that was actually EDITED to include the word 'possible' by THEM.....it's not a quote from the CDC. So WHO embellished for the best effect? According to the actual story below the headline, Attkisson calls them 'suspected' cases. Now, if they are 'suspected' and are being monitored (CDC itself states they are being monitored), they are more than just 'possible'......and the liberal media is covering for the CDC by not holding them accountable and reporting that that many cases are being monitored. Or does the CDC usually monitor people that have flu symptoms that 'could' be something else? What kinds of cases do you think the CDC would monitor or would they only monitor something they 'suspect' is something else?
As for the 'headline' in the story, that was actually EDITED to include the word 'possible' by THEM..
Good night Gracie.
Maybe one day you'll leave a real mark...........
the headline IN THE STORY was to show how James had changed the headline..and used it as a subject line in his OP. I said it 3 times...you still don't get it.
Yet you make posts complaining about the kids not understanding....
I wasn't talking about the response in the article
I was talking about the Subject line used by James, and his creative editing of the headline used in the story.
James was the "they" that had to embellish the story.
Or does the CDC usually monitor people that have flu symptoms that 'could' be something else?
All passengers arriving in the United States from the West African countries where the Ebola outbreak is ongoing will now be monitored for 21 days, officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said today.
Pull the covers up over your head...I'm putting you and this subject to bed.
ebola
cases
US
1400
"not putting it on the web" = Big Hush since they have LOTS of ebola stuff on their site.
and then link to another site for comparison.
You JP are so far out in left field you are stepping in those cow patties again.
It's difficult not to...I know 2 people that are mass producing them.
YOUR genetics since you only know two people mass producing and they must be your family members (perhaps you are one of the two). And since you don't know me I know I'm not one of those two. I was trying to be sympathetic to your plight.
I would think you SHOULD since you're linking THEIR story.
Post a story on YOUR Glenburnie site and make up YOUR own story AND headlines.
No comment on?
The new monitoring rules mean that even people who don't have a fever when they arrive in the United States, and who don't report exposure to Ebola in the entry screening, will still have to provide information to health officials, and report their temperature once a day for 21 days.