The USA CNET reviews are not so good for either camera.
If you are looking for good photo quality, I would not pick either one.
Quote from the reviews:
S8200 - "its photo quality isn't for everybody"
WB150F - "The camera's photo quality is barely better than a smartphone's"
A tip:
For good photo quality avoid any small camera that has 16 megapixels.
....Too many pixels on a too small sensor assembly.
....That means excessive noise which causes the camera maker to be too aggressive with the noise reduction firmware.
...Which causes loss of detail.
For very good photo quality. you should take a look at the Canon SX230.
Hi there,
I'm looking to pick up a new super-zoom shortly. I'm a digital camera novice, so essentially want something simple that will do most of the work for me. I'm going on a Safari soon, hence the long zoom, but would ideally like to keep the camera in my pocket most of the rest of the time.
I've seen both the Samsung WB150F and Nikon Coolpix S8200 which have had excellent reviews on the Cnet UK pages, any advice as to how these stack up against each other or if there is a clearly better camera for my purposes for around the £200-£250 mark, would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic