HolidayBuyer's Guide

Speakeasy forum

General discussion

Super-Pacs...I don't care for them

by Steven Haninger / August 10, 2012 8:31 PM PDT

Their source is too anonymous and so is who manages them and who is accountable for what they release. This can lead to abuse and I believe it already has. There seems to be no vetting process to verify what is fact or fiction in their ads and nor is there any way to know if some are intentionally deceptive.

The worst part, IMO, is that candidates can too easily separate themselves from PAC generated ads that produce backlash or negative press. Disclaimers and apologies are about all they can make but the damage is already done and the voting population short changed. I would like to see them gone.

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Super-Pacs...I don't care for them
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Super-Pacs...I don't care for them
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
I totally agree.
by Diana Forum moderator / August 11, 2012 4:44 AM PDT

I do believe that scotus blew it on this one.

Diana

Collapse -
I agree as well. A grave error running in the face of 200
by Ziks511 / August 12, 2012 2:16 PM PDT

years of precedent.

Rob

Popular Forums
icon
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
icon
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
icon
Laptops 21,181 discussions
icon
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
icon
Phones 17,137 discussions
icon
Security 31,287 discussions
icon
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
icon
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
icon
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

HOLIDAY GIFT GUIDE 2017

Cameras that make great holiday gifts

Let them start the new year with a step up in photo and video quality from a phone.