Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

Sunlight (and air?) is not free.

Nov 16, 2013 3:01AM PST

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
I read that earlier in the article
Nov 16, 2013 5:07AM PST

and realized there must be some mistake in it. No way it could be 70 cents per kilowatt, more likely per 1000 kilowatts. Here they do it different, you pay an infrastructure charge, a billing office charge, and then the kilowatt charge is based ONLY on the electricity used. That way everyone who is on the grid is paying for the upkeep and repair of electric lines anyway.

- Collapse -
That's the dumbest thing I've heard in a very long time.
Nov 16, 2013 1:30PM PST

Water in Arizona is costly, Solar energy should be left to flourish.

Rob

- Collapse -
Well if they unhook totally from the grid
Nov 16, 2013 9:35PM PST

I bet they won't have to pay it.

It's the same type of thing as a minimum base rate you normally pay for electric or water service, at least around here forever, probably others.

Even if you're gone all month, if you're on a municipal water supply there is a minimum charge. Last residence I had connected to county water supply it was for 2000 gallons a month, if the rate changed the $ amount changed. Same for electricity, but I don't know what it is because I've never been that low. The only people I ever knew that ran into the minimum had electricity at barns or something seasonal that was turned off when they weren't used. You still pay a minimum. This seems to be more of the same.

If you're connected to the grid, you should have an obligation to pay your share of maintenance and upgrade cost whether you use it or not. You want it available just in case, you have to pay for it.

The rate may be debatable, I have no idea of what would be proper. The requirement is understandable.

- Collapse -
Forgot to add
Nov 16, 2013 9:38PM PST

also most cases if you actually generate more than you use that month you may be hooked up where it feed back to the grid and you get a credit, I think that's a legal requirement now. That means different equipment and hookups at your site than one that doesn't generate.

The credit is less than you pay I'm sure, but the next result to the electric company is probably a cost rather than a profit with equipment, monitoring, and paperwork.