Resolved Question

Streaming TV through Ethernet vs. WiFi

Wondering if anybody has had any experience streaming TV (Hulu, Netflix, etc.) by way of an ethernet connection vs. WiFi? If so, is the experience and quality the same, similar, better, worse?

I am trying to “cut the cord” from traditional cable TV services, but would prefer not to stream over WiFi, as I’m trying to minimize the EMF waves / signals that are being transmitted throughout the house.

I do realize that doing this does not eliminate the “problem” that I’m trying to solve for since, as I understand it, the router is always “working” in the background. I’m just trying to find a way to minimize the amount of EMF exposure to my newborn and toddler. Yes, I know there’s a lot of debate around this topic, but when it comes to the health of my children, I’m going to err on the side of trying to create a “safer” environment for them where and when I can... if I can.

Thank you in advance for any help / suggestions!

Discussion is locked
brand57 has chosen the best answer to their question. View answer
Follow
Reply to: Streaming TV through Ethernet vs. WiFi
PLEASE NOTE: Do not post advertisements, offensive materials, profanity, or personal attacks. Please remember to be considerate of other members. If you are new to the CNET Forums, please read our CNET Forums FAQ. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Reporting: Streaming TV through Ethernet vs. WiFi
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Comments
- Collapse -
Clarification Request
Yes, router is ‘working’ but....

...most modern routers let you disable wifi easily.

AFAIK the research stil has not proven any conclusive links to wifi radiation being harmful unless you are living inches from the device 24/7.
It’s curious to me also how many similar sites (that often still have the unsubstantiated slant to the silly immunization/autism link) fail to acknowledge the radiation we all receive outside that is not completely filtered by the atmosphere.

- Collapse -
Re immunisation link to autism

Please don’t ridicule this, without knowing what you are talking about, it is not common but there are cases of autism occurring shortly after the MMR was given, I know this personally....the government will never acknowledge this as the cost & embarrassment would be enormous. The MMR was Never tested properly, it was rushed out as cheap way to give 3 vaccines at once.

Just to be clear

- Collapse -
No ridicule here.

But, in streaming tv? Locking this.
Dafydd.

Best Answer

- Collapse -
Ethernet is great if you can do that.

You'll get less troubles most of the time and meet your goal.

As to the router with WiFi, every model I've used since the 90's has supplied a setting to turn off the radio section.

- Collapse -
Answer
Re: Ethernet versus WiFi

Ethernet certainly is not worse then wireless. It might be "better", but I don't think you will see any difference.

In most routers, you can turn of the wireless transmission if you don't want to use it for any device (like laptop, tablet, smartphone). Check the router admin page for the options.

Post was last edited on March 21, 2018 7:41 AM PDT

CNET Forums