Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

Startups on XP?

Jun 5, 2007 7:07AM PDT

I used to get rid of a bunch of stuff in startup when I was using Win 98. People told me that I could get rid of pretty much everything, at one time. I don't know if XP is a different animal or not when it comes to resources.

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
That depends
Jun 5, 2007 7:13AM PDT

If you mean resources as in System Resources that was the bane of many DOS based Windows users' existence, then XP is a completely different beast. It's based on the NT kernel, which shares absolutely no ancestry with DOS. It's also why there are some compatibility issues with XP and some older Windows and DOS apps, but you can read up on that on your own.

If you mean resources in a more generic way... XP is generally much more hungry for RAM and CPU time. Same with apps for XP, which often model themselves after the Microsoft example, of chucking in every conceivable feature, that someone, somewhere, some time, might in some way use. Or as I call it, the Kitchen Sink Development Model, because the kitchen sink is probably in there somewhere if you look hard enough... I actually think there was an easter egg in Word 6 that was an image of a kitchen sink, but don't quote me on that, I could be confusing it with some other app.

- Collapse -
Hmm, well I guess there are different flavors
Jun 5, 2007 7:33AM PDT

of 'resources,' then. So would it still pay to remove stuff from startup? It may not matter because I'll be increasing the RAM, making it relatively moot point -- well, not counting the CPU.

- Collapse -
Dragon
Jun 5, 2007 8:01AM PDT