...much time would elapse before the astronomers wouldn't see it any more?
![]() | Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years. Thanks, CNET Support |
Discussion is locked
...much time would elapse before the astronomers wouldn't see it any more?
I wish that site gave a bit more basic info on the stars they discuss, like distance, type of star, etc.
Since the milky way galaxy is roughly 100,000 light years across, and since we are some distance away from the edge, the star in question would have to be something less than 100,000 light years away.
(As these things go.
)
As to the age, that's as accurate as the ever-popular radioactive decay system allows:
"For the first time, the age dating involved both radioactive elements in combination with the three other neutron-capture elements europium, osmium, and iridium.
'Until now, it has not been possible to measure more than a single cosmic clock for a star. Now, however, we have managed to make six measurements in this one star', says Frebel."
"Ever since the star was born, these 'clocks' have ticked away over the eons, unaffected by the turbulent history of the Milky Way. They now read 13.2 billion years.
The Universe being 13.7 billion years old, this star clearly formed very early in the life of our own Galaxy, which must also formed very soon after the Big Bang."
Myself, I thought that would be an anomaly: Great age usually means great distance from us (looking back to the beginning). All the naked eye stars (not including nebulae that appear as point sources to the naked eye) are in the Milky Way - our 'next door neighbors'!
They own some impressive optics.
...how many miles is 7,500 light years?
Multiply that times 186,000. :-}
Maybe around 733,714,200,000,000 miles. I did this kind of fast, on a calculator, so I wouldn't fully trust it.
"a big bunch".
But 7500 isn't much relative to the distance to Andromeda, a "nearby" other galaxy.
...last 100 to 200 years or so, the astronomers could have been looking at a star what isn't there. If the light from that star went out today, we would not know it in our lifetime nor our children's lifetime...and possibly in their children's life time.
story on the original link site, you'll notice the scientists saying 'if Eta Carinae explodes ...'
If they're right about what's happening to it, then it certainly has exploded. Scientists are pragmatic in their language, like talking about "sunrise" and "sunset" when they know there are no such things. ![]()
Possibly it could have gone out a thousand years ago, though people from Earth would be able to see the fireworks, someday.
i based my previous answer on old star maps (which i mis-read)i have at home, but it didn't "click" so i went to the source and it's 7,500 light years.....
jonah "spell check isn't enough" jones
.,
...take a few millenniums before an earthling knew the light went out on that star.
You need to bite the bullet and make a trip to AAA for new ones.
Perspective: We're "only" 8-plus light-minutes from our own sun, but try walking that distance.
That's a lot more than 6000 years ...
Say, don't stars burn?
Thanks for the link. ![]()