Thank you for being a valued part of the CNET community. As of December 1, 2020, the forums are in read-only format. In early 2021, CNET Forums will no longer be available. We are grateful for the participation and advice you have provided to one another over the years.

Thanks,

CNET Support

General discussion

SP2 Question

Jun 9, 2005 11:16PM PDT

Hi: Can you all tell me the pros and cons of having SP2 installed on my computer. I have heard some horror stories after people have downloaded SP2 on their computer that I am really afraid to do so. I have antivirus, a personal firewall, and am looking for spyware that doesn't spy. So, why do I need SP2? Please advise. Thanks in advance!

Discussion is locked

- Collapse -
Security
Jun 10, 2005 12:26AM PDT

The only times I've ever seen a problem with SP2, is when a person has some spyware on the system. SP2 just causes the inevitable total system crash to happen immediately, instead of at some random point in the future.

If you've got a system that's free of viruses, spyware, and similar pests, there shouldn't be any problems with installing SP2. And considering the HUGE number of rather critical security holes fixed in SP2, it should be applied immediately, if not sooner. A firewall won't protect against some of the things fixed in SP2. It will also soon become the case that all future security updates for Windows will depend on SP2 being installed.

- Collapse -
Is SP2 needed?
Jun 11, 2005 5:43AM PDT

Anyone else Wink

- Collapse -
Is SP2 needed?
Jun 11, 2005 5:51AM PDT
- Collapse -
Don't get it
Jun 11, 2005 5:55AM PDT

Just don't get it. There are no pros, only cons. SP2 offer no real advantages whatsoever. The only thing it boasts is an "improved" windows firewall. But all it does is blocking incoming connections. There are no advanced options. A vastly improved piece of useless software is still useless. The horror stories happen rarely, but do happen. And they're not only due to spyware/malware. It happenes much more often on slower systems, and for a good reason. SP2 consumes a lot of system resources, not only harddisk space and also ram used to run basic processes. It will always slow down your system. The lag is significant on lower end PCs, and mostly unnoticable for top end machines.

SP2 offers no protection against spyware/malware. For that you would have to scrap IE and get a more secure browser, such as Firefox or Netscape.

Some people would tell you to get SP2 because they got it, and their computer still seems to work. But they can't tell you of the benefits, because there aren't any.

There is a reason new brand name PCs ships to you with a copy of SP1 Windows XP, and not SP2.

- Collapse -
Just one thing.
Jun 11, 2005 5:55AM PDT

Many patches require SP2. If you can live without any further patches or updates then you can live without SP2.

-> Point blank. I have yet to find any killer reason to not install SP2. However with all the spyware and damaged OSes I've encountered I can see why many are gunshy to pull the trigger.

Bob

- Collapse -
RE
Jun 11, 2005 6:02AM PDT

Last time I checked, none of the vital security updates require SP2. If you want to update Windows Media Player, then good luck with that. It'll mess up your system far worse than SP2.

Just because you can't find reasons for not getting SP2 doesn't mean you should get it. Where are the benefits? Can't find any? Of course you can't find things that doesn't exist. I can give you many reasons for not installing SP2. Extra system resources used, lag on your computer, extra harddisk required, and the chance of one of these horror stories happening.

There are no pros, only cons... -_-

- Collapse -
You just supplied an example where SP2 was required.
Jun 11, 2005 6:12AM PDT

At the office with over 100+ machines at XP SP2, we never hit a snag.

-> Some aren't as lucky.

Bob

- Collapse -
RE
Jun 11, 2005 6:23AM PDT

Yeah, you mean one of these monotone office PCs? I bet you never play games, or even watch videos on it. If all you do on your computer is typing, then of course nothing bad will happen. These computers are working at such a light load it's a waste of electricty! -_-

Installing SP2 is like an invasive surgery. Complications can arise with patients who have existing ailments. It interacts with existing programs and modified system registry to produce a toxic combination. Lightly loaded computers can survive it. Heavily loaded computers, especially lower end ones, may not.

Would you go through surgery when there are no benefits, only harms, and possibly getting killed? Why would you put your computer through that? Don't cry if it dies on you... -_-