Video Cameras forum

General discussion

sony hdr-xr500 or sony hdr-cx520

by ninomninom / September 18, 2009 7:54 AM PDT


I am about to buy one of these camcorders (hdr-xr500 or hdr-cx520). They have the same price on sony web site and actually you can find the hdr-xr500 with a cheaper price on amazon. I compared 2 cameras and they are almost the same . You can compare from the link below
There are just some slight differences

hdr-xr500 has 120 GB and hdr-cx520 has 64 GB capacity
hdr-xr500 has view finder hdr-cx520 does not have
hdr-xr500 has better lcd
Only advantage of hdr-cx520 is, it is a little bit smaller
hdr-cx520 62 x 65 x 133mm and hdr-xr500 71 x 75 x 137mm and hdr-cx520 is 100 gr lighter

The point I can not understand is if hdr-cx520 has no advantages over xr500 , why sony released this new version. I can buy hdr-xr500 with a cheaper price and with some extra tools and it has 1x more recording capacity over hdr-cx520.

I want to buy the better one even it is 100-200 dollars more but I don't want to pay more and buy just a new version with no advantages.

Any comments will be usefull, please do not hesitate to make comments. Thanks in advance

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: sony hdr-xr500 or sony hdr-cx520
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: sony hdr-xr500 or sony hdr-cx520
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.
Collapse -
RE:sony hdr-xr500 or sony hdr-cx520
by dominic_1976 / September 18, 2009 11:35 AM PDT

I'm looking at the same comparison.

Pro of CX520 vs XR520
1.Sony CX520 comes with flash memory not hard drive, thus it removes the risk of hard drive crash.
2. Smaller and lighter (I don't really see this as a main pro reason to purchase this)
3. New User Interface? I have tested this but it seems as confusing as the XR520. Maybe I'm too used to buttons operated menu.
4. Personally when I tested out the XR series, I can feel the vibration on the hard drive on my palm. Although the vibration is not very pronounce, you can feel the difference when you switch to CX which doesn't have any vibration at all due to flash memory.

Con of CX520 vs XR520
1. XR520 bigger hard drive (do you need so much storage?)
2. XR has viewfinder. CX don't. It's a personal thing on viewfinder. After having a camcorder for so long, I notice that I never use the viewfinder. Reason being my usage is only taking video of family and some scenary. So for me it's ok not to have a viewfinder. Again, it depends on your usage.
3. XR user interface is different. Maybe better than CX? Maybe worst? Personally I like the XR menu a bit better than CX. Reason being it has hard button for me to press on.
4. CX is almost buttonless. All controls are done via the lcd touch-screen. If the screen is spoilt, you can't operate it anymore. You'll have to replace the lcd. For XR, at least when the lcd is spoilt, you have some buttons and viewfinder to operate it temporarily.
5. XR has Better and bigger lcd screen

Here's a link to a comparison made:

Collapse -
low loght performance
by ninomninom / September 19, 2009 1:09 AM PDT

thank you so much for the comment. it is good to know I am not the only one looking for answer. I called sony to get more information, but call center was not aware of the situation, I think they are just using the sony web page, and using the compare tool. They even advised me to buy xr series because of the capacity advantage. I have read some reviews, advertisement and they were mentioning "best low light performance" . But both camera has the same features. Do you think this only for cx series or low light performance is valid for xr and cx series. Or is this something that we can notice while watching.

As you mentioned if I don't have any problem with capacity 120GB or 64 GB should not be the case. I was using hdr-sr7 before and 64 GB capacity was more than enough. But still xr series looks better isn't it ?

Collapse -
RE:low loght performance
by dominic_1976 / September 19, 2009 1:45 AM PDT
In reply to: low loght performance

Both of the model have the same optics thus I would think both have same low light performance.

One thing to highlight is the CX comes with stabiization on rotation while I don't think the XR does.

You may want to try the XR and CX out in shops before buying them. Just to get a feel of the user interface, viewfinder, etc etc.

Personally I like that XR better.

Collapse -
by VAJIFDARDEVDATT / November 27, 2010 7:08 AM PST

Post 8 of 8

Popular Forums
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
Laptops 21,181 discussions
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
Phones 17,137 discussions
Security 31,287 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
Windows 10 2,657 discussions


Your favorite shows are back!

Don’t miss your dramas, sitcoms and reality shows. Find out when and where they’re airing!