Phones forum


Someone's phone being dead affecting SMS delivered time

by wherebouts1372 / April 29, 2011 2:26 AM PDT

This is my understanding:
If someone's phone is off/dead than if you send them an SMS, it will not be delivered until they turn their phone back on. So it's safe to assume that if the sent and delivered times you see on your phone in the message you sent are the same, that their phone received the message when you sent it. Is this corrrect? And does anyone know if this is true for all phones/service providers?

Discussion is locked
You are posting a reply to: Someone's phone being dead affecting SMS delivered time
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Please refer to our CNET Forums policies for details. All submitted content is subject to our Terms of Use.
Track this discussion and email me when there are updates

If you're asking for technical help, please be sure to include all your system info, including operating system, model number, and any other specifics related to the problem. Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended.

You are reporting the following post: Someone's phone being dead affecting SMS delivered time
This post has been flagged and will be reviewed by our staff. Thank you for helping us maintain CNET's great community.
Sorry, there was a problem flagging this post. Please try again now or at a later time.
If you believe this post is offensive or violates the CNET Forums' Usage policies, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the post). Once reported, our moderators will be notified and the post will be reviewed.

All Answers

Collapse -
Nice question.
by R. Proffitt Forum moderator / April 29, 2011 2:33 AM PDT

But since SMS is not a sure thing, it's possible for such to get lost forever. And here on just a few phones from one network to the next I've seen messages arrive with a time before it was sent as well as long delays of 10 or more minutes.

What I'm getting at here is a question. Were you thinking that this was reliable?

Collapse -
Was it reliable?
by wherebouts1372 / April 29, 2011 3:23 AM PDT
In reply to: Nice question.

You bring up a good point about in not being a sure thing. But here's what we're looking at: They DID receive the messages but not until they supposedly plugged their phone in to charge. Which from what I've read about how SMS messages work, it will continue to try to send the messages for a certain period of time so it makes sense they would receive them once they phone turned on. We tested with someone else and found that if they turned their phone off and we sent a text message, the delivered time would not show until they turned it back on and the message was delivered (makes sense). And the send/delivery times showed the 4 minutes between sending the message (sent time) and them turning their phone back on and actually receiving it (delivered time).

Collapse -
More than likely your suspicions are correct, but...
by Pepe7 / April 29, 2011 5:21 AM PDT
In reply to: Was it reliable?

...going by what Bob said, are you expecting this technology to be ample proof a la CSI(?)

Popular Forums
Computer Newbies 10,686 discussions
Computer Help 54,365 discussions
Laptops 21,181 discussions
Networking & Wireless 16,313 discussions
Phones 17,137 discussions
Security 31,287 discussions
TVs & Home Theaters 22,101 discussions
Windows 7 8,164 discussions
Windows 10 2,657 discussions

Does BMW or Volvo do it best?

Pint-size luxury and funky style

Shopping for a new car this weekend? See how the BMW X2 stacks up against the Volvo XC40 in our side-by-side comparison.