showing a restaurant owner throwing out, with huge insults, a small party of people who were pro-life activists who just came to his restaurant for lunch after a protest nearby. The owner not only berated them for not being pro-choice but got verbally and graphically abusive about other issues regarding sexual behavior.
Now, I have to ask.........do liberals believe he was within his rights to not serve these paying customers because of HIS freedom of speech and other rights given to him under the Constitution? If so, then why weren't the same rights given to the bakery that refused to deliver or bake a cake for the gay couple a few years back to the point that those owners lost their business due to legal fees trying to fight for their right to do so?
I haven't seen even ONE liberal media station or website report on this restaurant owner story, have you? Does 'free speech' only travel in one direction when it comes to liberal activists?
Good for him...Following the bosses orders....AND Spending taxpayers money. Seen figures of around $400k for the cost of the sideshow....
NO figures on the number of people that followed HIS lead and left the game. HIS security team and the wife don't count.... Follow me boys and girls...this way to the exit....
Probably none...it's one thing to spend someones else's money (the taxpayer) to express YOUR position, and another to spend YOUR OWN money to express an opinion.
There should have been a few Trump supporters there....Walk out and send a bill to the POTUS?...he's got you covered?

Chowhound
Comic Vine
GameFAQs
GameSpot
Giant Bomb
TechRepublic